Dmitry,
> 1) If we ever face a platform with sizeof(int) == 8 (IA64? anything
> else?) would it be OK that our API becomes platform-specific in regard
> to its ABI? Or was it exactly the goal? IIRC, we had discussed using
> types from stdint.h instead, but I don't remember any decision.
>
When t
On 03/18/13 17:43, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
> On 18/03/2013 10:39, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> We have switched from artificially stable datatypes (ISC_*) to native
>> ones in the new API. I have two related questions:
>>
>> 1) If we ever face a platform with sizeof(int) == 8 (IA
On 18/03/2013 10:39, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> All,
>
> We have switched from artificially stable datatypes (ISC_*) to native
> ones in the new API. I have two related questions:
>
> 1) If we ever face a platform with sizeof(int) == 8 (IA64? anything
> else?) would it be OK that our API becomes pla
All,
We have switched from artificially stable datatypes (ISC_*) to native
ones in the new API. I have two related questions:
1) If we ever face a platform with sizeof(int) == 8 (IA64? anything
else?) would it be OK that our API becomes platform-specific in regard
to its ABI? Or was it exactly
