On 28/05/2018 02:02, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
>
>> For system tables, their IDs starts with 0, while user tables starts
>> at 128.
>>
>> User procedures already starts with 0, so initially I'm creating system
>> procedures with negative IDs.
>
> I suppose you assign IDs directly, without generator usa
28.05.2018 12:32, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 28/05/2018 07:30, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
I mean: during creation of database already created many definitions
for tables, generators and so on. It is easy to add definition for
couple of UDRs the same way.
Where did you read I'm do
On 28/05/2018 07:30, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>
> I mean: during creation of database already created many definitions
> for tables, generators and so on. It is easy to add definition for
> couple of UDRs the same way.
>
>
Where did you read I'm doing anything different?
Adriano
28.05.2018 12:27, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
28.05.2018 12:21, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
What's the difference between built-in UDR and "system procedure
coded in C++"?
*U* stands for User. Need to have metadata manually created. Cannot
access engine internals if needed.
In S
28.05.2018 12:21, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
What's the difference between built-in UDR and "system procedure
coded in C++"?
*U* stands for User. Need to have metadata manually created. Cannot
access engine internals if needed.
In SysFunction.cpp there is a lot of system functi
On 28/05/2018 07:19, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 28.05.2018 12:16, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> On 28/05/2018 06:16, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
>>> 28.05.2018 3:04, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I'm adding system procedure support, coded in C++, initially for list
time zone
On 28/05/2018 02:02, Dmitry Yemanov wrote:
> 28.05.2018 04:04, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>
>> I'm adding system procedure support, coded in C++, initially for list
>> time zone rule transition, as it can't be done with virtual table (needs
>> parameters).
>>
>> I see others great potenti
28.05.2018 12:16, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
On 28/05/2018 06:16, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
28.05.2018 3:04, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I'm adding system procedure support, coded in C++, initially for list
time zone rule transition, as it can't be done with virtual table (need
On 28/05/2018 06:16, Dimitry Sibiryakov wrote:
> 28.05.2018 3:04, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>> I'm adding system procedure support, coded in C++, initially for list
>> time zone rule transition, as it can't be done with virtual table (needs
>> parameters).
>
> Aren't UDRs already implem
28.05.2018 3:04, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I'm adding system procedure support, coded in C++, initially for list
time zone rule transition, as it can't be done with virtual table (needs
parameters).
Aren't UDRs already implemented?
--
WBR, SD.
--
2018-05-28 8:02 GMT+03:00 Dmitry Yemanov :
> 28.05.2018 04:04, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
>>
>>
>> I'm adding system procedure support, coded in C++, initially for list
>> time zone rule transition, as it can't be done with virtual table (needs
>> parameters).
>>
>> I see others great pote
28.05.2018 04:04, Adriano dos Santos Fernandes wrote:
I'm adding system procedure support, coded in C++, initially for list
time zone rule transition, as it can't be done with virtual table (needs
parameters).
I see others great potentials with this. We can also later code system
triggers with
Hi!
I'm adding system procedure support, coded in C++, initially for list
time zone rule transition, as it can't be done with virtual table (needs
parameters).
I see others great potentials with this. We can also later code system
triggers with them, as they are currently coded directly in BLR an
13 matches
Mail list logo
