On 10/24/11 15:27, Damyan Ivanov wrote:
>> We had that port in FB1, but later cleaned it up. And I see no
>> reasons to return to it.
> I'd suggest to not put too much effort into that or any other port.
> Let people interested in the port submit patches. I hope at least
> there is an implement
-=| Alex Peshkoff, 20.10.2011 16:40:04 +0400 |=-
> Hi, Dam!
>
> Can you comment something about this issue:
> http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3637
>
> Telling true I'm surprised. Why is that port needed at all?
No idea. People need different things :)
> May be there is a real park o
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Alex Peshkoff wrote:
> Hi, Dam!
>
> Can you comment something about this issue:
> http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-3637
>
> Telling true I'm surprised. Why is that port needed at all?
> May be there is a real park of old 68k machines? Wikipedia mentions
