On 11/2/07, paha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've got confirmation, that SqlDataAdapter do throws DBConcurrencyException
> when all row updates fail in ContinueUpdateOnError=true mode, and erroneous
> rows are not committed (RowVersion remains Modified).
I'll test this myself.
--
Jiri {x2} Ci
I've got confirmation, that SqlDataAdapter do throws DBConcurrencyException
when all row updates fail in ContinueUpdateOnError=true mode, and erroneous
rows are not committed (RowVersion remains Modified).
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DBConcurrencyException-tf473195
On 11/2/07, Roman Rokytskyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> P.S. BTW, I'm pretty sure when you have correct unicode database and
> specify correct non-unicode charset when connecting in IBExpert or ODBC
> driver, you will get your characters back.
This depends on characters. If you have UTF8 colum
On 11/2/07, Roman Rokytskyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you willing to tell me that with NONE charset you can see Japaneese,
> Chinese, Czech and Ukrainian characters simultaneously? :))
In some situations, when you're mad developer, you can (in
application). :) Else not.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincu
Hello:
> Are you willing to tell me that with NONE charset you can see Japaneese,
> Chinese, Czech and Ukrainian characters simultaneously? :))
IMHO, i will avoid the usage of NONE character set in the provider (
unless you are quite sure about what your are doing of course ),
reasons are, using
>> P.S. BTW, I'm pretty sure when you have correct unicode database and
>> specify correct non-unicode charset when connecting in IBExpert or ODBC
>> driver, you will get your characters back.
>
> This depends on characters. If you have UTF8 column and there's a
> japanese character in row, then u
Readme for installing DDEX has not correct info
---
Key: DNET-129
URL: http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/DNET-129
Project: .NET Data provider
Issue Type: Bug
Components: DDEX Provider
> 1] put back encoding of "UNICODE_FSS" to "UTF-8" and find replacements for
> DB client and ODBC driver. Currently I use IBExpert and ODBC
> "Firebird/Interbase Driver" by IBPhoenix.
>
> 2] keep the changed version and possibly have invalid unicode characters in
> my DB when using other ODBC
Hi Carlos,
I've found, that in tracker we have 2.1.0 RC2 marked as unreleased.
This can be a little bit confusing for reporters. Can you, please,
mark it as released?
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
-
On 11/2/07, Carlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> He can ask in the ODBC driver list how to set up it correctly to use
> UTF-8, and check if he is doing thinks the right way :)
Yep.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
Hola:
> My vote is 1). But hard to say, whether you'll find ODBC driver with
> Unicode support (if this has no support).
He can ask in the ODBC driver list how to set up it correctly to use
UTF-8, and check if he is doing thinks the right way :)
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
Blog
Jiri Cincura wrote:
>
> On 11/2/07, paha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Correct, but i would like to get from provider original localized
>> messages
>> for standard exceptions like concurrency to identify the exception
>> itself,
>> not to show it direct to user ;-) . It is not perfect, and must
On 11/2/07, Pave Sejrek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK,
> so what should I do?
> 1] put back encoding of "UNICODE_FSS" to "UTF-8" and find replacements for
> DB client and ODBC driver. Currently I use IBExpert and ODBC
> "Firebird/Interbase Driver" by IBPhoenix.
>
> 2] keep the changed version and
OK,
so what should I do?
1] put back encoding of "UNICODE_FSS" to "UTF-8" and find replacements for
DB client and ODBC driver. Currently I use IBExpert and ODBC
"Firebird/Interbase Driver" by IBPhoenix.
2] keep the changed version and possibly have invalid unicode characters in
my DB when using
On 11/2/07, paha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Correct, but i would like to get from provider original localized messages
> for standard exceptions like concurrency to identify the exception itself,
> not to show it direct to user ;-) . It is not perfect, and must be avoided
> in any way, but if it
paha wrote:
>
> Could you give me direct link to bugtracker please :)
>
I found it
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/DBConcurrencyException-tf4731950.html#a13544215
Sent from the firebird-net-provider mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Jiri Cincura wrote:
>
> On 11/2/07, Carlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> putting them into the tracker will be the best.
>
> OK. Please, Paha, can you put every single problme into tracker, with
> description (try to use as much as possible info from this thread,
> etc.)? We'll look at it and i
Jiri Cincura wrote:
>
> On 11/2/07, paha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You are 100% right, i asked the same questions yesterday on russian forum
>> to
>> know, how sqladapter performs, but still no response. What i can say for
>> sure, if you get DBConcurrencyException, you definitely should hav
On 11/2/07, Carlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> putting them into the tracker will be the best.
OK. Please, Paha, can you put every single problme into tracker, with
description (try to use as much as possible info from this thread,
etc.)? We'll look at it and it will be more clear. You can assing
On 11/2/07, paha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Jiri Cincura wrote:
> >
> > Oh, now I understand. I was almost sleeping, so I was thinking wrong.
> > So the main idea behind this is, "when I get error, let the row
> > untouched (without AcceptChanges) so I'll be able to repeat the call
> > to DB"
Changing to NONE does the same thing, that IBExpert do. Saving raw
UTF-8 date into column without any interpretation. So that you match
with IBEXpert.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (Microsoft Student Partner)
http://blog.vyvojar.cz/jirka/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
--
Hello:
> Maybe we can split prolems into seprate threads or create tracker
> items and solve problems there. What do you think?
putting them into the tracker will be the best.
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
Blog: http://carlosga.wordpress.com/
FirebirdClient : http://www.f
On 11/2/07, Carlos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should echeck what is being done by Sql Client if possible, and do
> the same thing.
I agree. But I thread we're talking about more than one problem, so
it's a little bit hard to keep what's going on.
Maybe we can split prolems into seprate threa
Jiri Cincura wrote:
>
> Oh, now I understand. I was almost sleeping, so I was thinking wrong.
> So the main idea behind this is, "when I get error, let the row
> untouched (without AcceptChanges) so I'll be able to repeat the call
> to DB", right?
>
Bingo :)) . I don't know if SqlDataAdapter do
On 11/2/07, paha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are 100% right, i asked the same questions yesterday on russian forum to
> know, how sqladapter performs, but still no response. What i can say for
> sure, if you get DBConcurrencyException, you definitely should have
> something in DBConcurrencyExc
> No Jiri, i mean, when we have ContinueOnError = true , and if we throw any
> exception or not, doesn't matter, we should call AcceptChanges (of course if
> AcceptChangesDuringUpdate = true) only for those rows, that have no error.
> As i said, imagine you have ContinueOnError=true and 2 rows viol
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez ™ wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
>> This may be not big problem to change. If there's no objection, I can do
>> this.
>
> We should echeck what is being done by Sql Client if possible, and do
> the same thing.
>
You are 100% right, i asked the same questions yesterday on russian fo
Hello:
> retrieved. But when reading these string over ODBC or in IBExpert they
IBExpert has no real support for UTF-8 ( at least as i know ), on ODBC
you should check if UTF-8 is correctly supported by the driver you are
using.
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
Blog: http://carl
Concerning the second part of my suggestion. Of course i can achieve desired
goals by setting AcceptChangesDuringUpdate= false and then after Update
looping throw rows committing "good" rows, and leaving "bad" rows aside. Of
course it would mean one extra loop for me what is not a problem for smal
Hello:
> This may be not big problem to change. If there's no objection, I can do this.
We should echeck what is being done by Sql Client if possible, and do
the same thing.
--
Carlos Guzmán Álvarez
Vigo-Spain
Blog: http://carlosga.wordpress.com/
FirebirdClient : http://www.fire
Jiri Cincura wrote:
>
>> One more little question, also about this Exceptions. What do you think
>> about throwing localized messages? (I mean storing once (new
>> DBConcurrencyException()).Message, (new DataException()).Message and so
>> on
>> somewhere in local dictionary, and using them inste
31 matches
Mail list logo
