On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 19:57, Ivan Arabadzhiev
wrote:
> but I just though I should ask if
> any other deallocation should take place.
If the command is inside using, you're safe.
> The server firebird server hasn`t crashed in more than an year, and I
> don`t reboot, so I assume if resources are
Tue, 04 May 2010 20:44:51 +0300, Jiri Cincura :
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:25, Ivan Arabadzhiev
> wrote:
>> So having inactive queries a few hours after their transactions have
>> ended
>> does not mean I messed up? :)
>
> Not necessarily.
>
Ok, so the reason I asked in the first place was th
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 15:25, Ivan Arabadzhiev
wrote:
> So having inactive queries a few hours after their transactions have ended
> does not mean I messed up? :)
Not necessarily.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop.com)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | http://www.ID3renamer.com
Tue, 04 May 2010 16:21:14 +0300, Jiri Cincura :
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 13:51, Ivan Arabadzhiev
> wrote:
>> Or is that table expected to show inactive querys (a history of some
>> sort)?
>
> It's a stable snapshot of time when issued. Also note whether the
> query is active or not.
>
So having
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 13:51, Ivan Arabadzhiev
wrote:
> Or is that table expected to show inactive querys (a history of some
> sort)?
It's a stable snapshot of time when issued. Also note whether the
query is active or not.
--
Jiri {x2} Cincura (CTO x2develop.com)
http://blog.cincura.net/ | htt
I am looking through a database of mine and can`t help noticing that
MON$STATEMENTS contains thing which should be done with a long time ago.
I don`t use fbcommand outside of "using(){}" but should anything else be
done? Or is that table expected to show inactive querys (a history of some
sor
