have an effect and even if logged in
with role RDB$ADMIN, only the given user is returned (other than if SYSDBA).
Thoughts? Is there any way to list the users?
If not, can it be added as a features that if logged in with RDB$ADMIN
role, that the users can be listed?
Thanks,
David
On 24 Feb
er other than
SYSDBA? More to the point, I want to create users who have administrative
function on the database (ie CREATE/DROP users) so that the SYSDBA user
(and its password) are not in use/shared. But I need to be able to
enumerate the list of users (eg FbSecurity.DisplayUsers()).
Thanks in a
v5.6.0.
Thanks,
David
On 1/8/2011 6:41 AM, Jiri Cincura wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 14:14, Rick Roen <
rick-tsx8mbjbjz1y5zq7n0bltdbpr1lh4...@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> What is the RoleName used for here?
>
> It does nothing. It's in API, but currently it's no
Thanks for getting back to me.
Can you or anyone please let me know what is the recommended approach in
the ADO.NET provider for performing a transaction across, let's say, 2
databases (eg a single command in each)?
On 5 November 2016 at 08:37, Jiří Činčura wrote:
> I don't think the Transactio
the connection but that doesn't seem
to matter.
Is the approach taken below the recommended flow? Any tips/ideas would be
welcome.
Best regards,
David
using (System.Transactions.TransactionScope scope = new
System.Transactions.Transaction
Sorry I missed you e-mail but I'm currently on leave. I will return to the
office on Monday the 13th of September
For all support inquiries please contact the office on +353 (0)1 5253600 or +44
(0)203 4681247
Alternatively please email supp...@navitassoftware.com .
Kind Regards,
Sorry I missed you e-mail but I'm currently on leave. I will return to the
office on Monday the 25th of May
For all support inquiries please contact the office on +353 (0)1 5253600 or +44
(0)203 4681247
Alternatively please email supp...@navitassoftware.com .
Kind Regards,
Sorry I missed you e-mail but I'm currently on leave. I will return to the
office on Monday the 15th of September
For all support inquiries please contact the office on +353 (0)1 5253600 or +44
(0)203 4681247
Alternatively please email supp...@navitassoftware.com .
Kind Regards,
Hi Jiri,
It was indeed a violation of unique constraint.
However, specifying Dialect 3 worked without any problem.
Thank you,
David
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Jiri Cincura wrote:
> What's the complete message? Isn't it a violation on PK?
>
>
> --
> Jiri {x
ted again the DB using dialect 3 and it is working without any
problem. The return value is not decimal.
Btw, is there a reason why the dialect defaults to 1 instead of 3 when
using FbConnectionStringBuilder?
Thank you,
David
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:05 AM, Mark Rotteveel wrote:
> On Thu, 2
or long if coding in C#.
I'm using Firebird Embedded.
David De Smet
Message sent from my iPhone
> On 20/03/2014, at 02:00, Jiri Cincura wrote:
>
> What's the datatype in DB and what's in your model? Very likely you
> have a mismatch there.
>
>
> --
>
Good day,
I'm using version 4.1.0.0 for .NET 4.5/4.0 with Entity Framework support of
the Firebird ADO.NET Data Provider.
I'm experiencing an InvalidCastException when trying to get a value of a
field which I assigned the DB type as decimal.
Looking further into the problem I'm seeing that the r
Good day,
I'm using version 4.1.0.0 for .NET 4.5/4.0 with Entity Framework support of
the Firebird ADO.NET Data Provider.
And I'm getting this exception when it shouldn't.
Let me further explain:
I have a table *Product*, with *Code* field which is unique and with DB
type as VarChar.
When I sav
Versions: 2.5.2
Reporter: David
Assignee: Jiri Cincura
Hi,
I use Version 2.5.2 of the .NET Provider to connect to a Interbase Database
(7.5 SP 1). In previous versions this worked well. I had to upgrade, because I
need Entity Framework compatibility. But the latest
Isn't there a list admin who can kick this guy off?
-Original Message-
From: Le Phuc [mailto:lep...@tonyvn.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 14 October 2009 10:10 a.m.
To: firebird-net-provider@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Firebird-net-provider] Auto-Reply:
Auto-Reply:Auto-Reply:Auto-Reply:Auto-R
How does the Firebird provider handle large blob field updates? Does it
cache the entire data in memory before writing to the database, or is it
possible to have the data sent to the database in smaller chunks?
--
Come bu
it certainly seems possible at
this stage.
Cheers,
David Clegg.
_
From: David Clegg [mailto:dcl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 22 September 2009 9:01 a.m.
To: 'For users and developers of the Firebird .NET providers'
Subject: RE: [Firebird-net-provider] Using the
I already do use the Embarcadero driver, but it only has 32 bit support, and
I am in a position where I need to deploy access from a bunch of 64 bit
servers. I can configure the web apps to run in a 32 bit worker process, but
I am looking to avoid that if possible.
Cheers,
David Clegg
Is it possible to use the Firebird .NET provider with Interbase databases at
all (in my case, I need to talk to an Interbase 2009 database)? All my
attempts so far have failed, with an exception being raised on connection
when the database version is attempted to be read.
Cheers,
David Clegg
Like I said in my original post, using CommandType.StoredProcedure returns
-1. Executing a stored procedure using the same syntax via FlameRobin also
displays "0 row(s) affected." Is it a problem with the database, not the
provider?
On 4/14/07, Carlos Guzmán Álvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Using Firebird embedded 2.0.1 and 27th Oct 2006 Data Provider for .NET 2.0
When using stored procedures via the EXECUTE PROCEDURE statement,
ExecuteNonQuery does not seem to be returning the number of rows affected.
CommandType is set to Text then ExecuteNonQuery returns 0, if set to
StoredProced
21 matches
Mail list logo
