Hey! Happy new year to all!
For me, it should have started with something great, new...
FINALLY! The migration from FB 1.5 to 2.5 (trust me, I had reasons not
to do it earlier). But now the old appications are all gone, and I can
migrate.
Seems there will be a delay. I migrated the
Thank you for the prompt answer, Sean.
But, no, I have read about this specific one.
And though I am sure I did not fully understand about it yet, since my
biggest database is only 1 GByte I *thought* this would not be a
problem for me.
Seems there will be a delay. I migrated the database from old hardware
running 1.5.4 to new hardware running 2.5.3. Backup/Restore is about 4
times faster. Wow!
But normal working is - at least - 50% slower sometimes worse.
[Old]
Server 2003 x86 no service packs
Xeon with 4 GB RAM
On 31-12-2014 21:03, sboyd...@gmail.com [firebird-support] wrote:
I have just migrated a system from Firebird 1.5 to 2.0.7.13318 running
on Windows 2008 R2. I backed up the data using gbak on 1.5. and reloaded
it using gbak on 2.0.7. Now on 2.0.7 I am being plagued by:
Attempt to call
Thank you for the prompt answer, Sean.
But, no, I have read about this specific one.
And though I am sure I did not fully understand about it yet, since my
biggest database is only 1 GByte I *thought* this would not be a
problem for me.
Do you still have access to old
On 2-1-2015 17:25, sboyd...@gmail.com [firebird-support] wrote:
Have you checked the database with gfix?
No, I haven't. What options would you suggest?
I'd start with a (full) validation.
Mark
--
Mark Rotteveel
Have you checked the database with gfix?
No, I haven't. What options would you suggest?
Did a gfix -v -f -n and no problems were reported.
Fascinating...
I created a test table on both old and new server to play with updates
and inserts (~ 150.000 records)
Performance with 2.5.3 x64 on Win2008 is constantly
changing, but at best its some 8 seconds and worst even 2 minutes!
Performance with 1.5.4 x86 on Win2003 is always about
Yes, the old system is running.
It *is* the current production system of our company and it looks like
I'll be glad if it holds on a bit longer :-)
Don't know the Crystal Disk Mark.
Will check this out for sure!
Was trying to get some clue from Process Explorer (the former
SysInternals
Hello Vlad,
It is sure Raid 0 with 3 * 600 GB Toshiba SAS. I only installed the
server today. I did not use the LSI Raid BIOS for configuration but
the server view installation kit from the producer. So I will have
to look up stripe size and BBU status.
Next week I will also apply a
On 3-1-2015 00:14, 'Leyne, Sean' s...@broadviewsoftware.com
[firebird-support] wrote:
[new]
Server 2008 R2 x64 SP1
Xeon with 8 GB RAM (I will shortly add +8) Classic 2.5.3 x64 Raid 0 on 3 *
600
GB SAS
Let me guess, you database is larger than 8GB (or 16GB in size)?
The problem is not
Hi, André !
[Old]
Server 2003 x86 no service packs
Xeon with 4 GB RAM
Classic 1.5.4 (x86, of course)
Raid 0 on 2 * 500 GB SAS (though this is from memory, I should look it up...)
[new]
Server 2008 R2 x64 SP1
Xeon with 8 GB RAM (I will shortly add +8)
Classic 2.5.3 x64
Raid 0 on 3 *
LSSBcfs Your problem is the infamous Windows 64bit File Cache causes excessive
Page File usage.
Btw, afaik, 2.5.3 should not have this problem with the Windows cache.
[]s
Carlos
Firebird Performance in Detail - http://videos.firebirddevelopersday.com
www.firebirdnews.org - www.FireBase.com.br
14 matches
Mail list logo
