> El 23 ago 2017, a las 19:56, Rudi Feijó rudi.fe...@multidadosti.com.br
> [firebird-support] escribió:
Isn't better install a debug version and capture the crash dump?
>
> El 21 ago 2017, a las 15:47, anshuman.na...@airtelmail.in [firebird-support]
> escribió:
>
> Thanks for this. Just a quick clarification. Which version are/were u
> using.
>
>
> We are using 2.5.2.26539 (x64) and the file IBDatabase.pas doesn't
2017-08-17 16:19 GMT+02:00 anshuman.na...@airtelmail.in [firebird-support] <
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>:
>
>
> Yes Jesús, we are using ibx.
>
> Can u please share the details with me. Of share the modified file if
> possible.
>
I have modified IBDatabase.pas. There is some checks that
> El 17 ago 2017, a las 15:33, Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl
> [firebird-support] escribió:
Are you using ibx?
I modified the source code of ibx in order to avoid this queries, that are only
used to know if a field is computed or not, and of course I
> El 4 ago 2017, a las 19:05, Dimitry Sibiryakov s...@ibphoenix.com
> [firebird-support] <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> escribió:
>
> 04.08.2017 18:52, Jesus Garcia jeg...@gmail.com [firebird-support] wrote:
>> As I understood he was saying to not use nbackup, an
> El 4 ago 2017, a las 16:54, 'Leyne, Sean' s...@broadviewsoftware.com
> [firebird-support] escribió:
>
> > I only see three items pending, but anyway, why not remove Nbackup from
> > firebird until it is safe to use?
>
> As others have pointed out, the
>
> Always use the latest release. For 2.5 it is 2.5.7. But even with this it is
> not
> guaranteed to work. Check list of nbackup-related bugs in tracker:
> http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?sorter/field=updated/order=
>
I only see three items pending, but anyway,
> El 23 jun 2017, a las 19:43, safirh...@yahoo.fr [firebird-support]
> escribió:
>
> Hi ,
> Please i have developped an application with delphi 7 and interbase 7.5
> server.
> I have used IBX components.
> Just i want to use Firebird instead of interbase 7.5
>> It is my First question in this group.
>>
>> I would like to know if someone has accomplished a migration from
>>
>> Interbase 7.5 to Firebird 2.5.4
I did it years ago.
1. Extract metadata from Interbase
2. Create the database in firebird with the metadata extracted. You may have to
>
> Here you delete some records, but then count whole table.
> Add same "where" condition as in "count" query
>
> Regards,
> Vlad
I think the execution of select count is for garbage collection.
If count of records that does not exists is executed, will be the garbage
collection executed for
> El 7/9/2015, a las 15:00, Tim Ward t...@telensa.com [firebird-support]
> escribió:
>
> Please can someone explain to me, again, why
>
> select Max(MYCOL) from MYTAB
>
> doesn't use the primary key
>
> PLAN (MYTAB NATURAL)
>
I think you need to have a
Hello Hector, what version of firebird are you running, super server, super
classic or classic server?
Jesus Angel Garcia Zarco
Cointec
> El 5/9/2015, a las 18:00, Hector Sánchez hec...@planatec.es
> [firebird-support] escribió:
>
> I discovered something
Hello jack, may be you have a problem with the metadata of your database, that
were compatible with interbase 6 but not with firebird. Firebird is more strict
than Interbase was. I had problem in the past backing up interbase 5.6 and
restoring in firebird.
The problem was solved, extracting
Thank you !
Vlad
Vlad, does this issue affect classic and superclassic?
El 12/5/2015, a las 20:56, shg_siste...@yahoo.com.ar [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com escribió:
Hello! I have a Delphi app with Firebird. Everything in a single PC which is
accesed via Remote Desktop by 5 or 6 users.
It worked fine for much years. But since
El 5/5/2015, a las 12:15, Nick Upson n...@telensa.com [firebird-support]
firebird-support@yahoogroups.com escribió:
Hi
I have a system that is slowing down the longer it stays running and I'd like
to know why.
The system is running firebird 2.1.5 on centos 5 with an average of 27
If you execute transaction.commitretaining the transaction counter increases
but no new transaction is created, then you don't see that number in the log.
Jesus Angel Garcia Zarco
Cointec
El 15/4/2015, a las 9:50, hannu.laurikai...@yahoo.com [firebird-support]
2014-12-16 9:39 GMT+01:00 Mark Rotteveel m...@lawinegevaar.nl
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com:
My first suggestion would be to upgrade to 2.5.3 Update 1 and backup and
restore your database.
Why is needed to backup + restore the database when upgrade to 2.5.3. As I
know is
El 20/06/2014, a las 21:33, Ivan Arabadzhiev intelru...@yahoo.com
[firebird-support] firebird-support@yahoogroups.com escribió:
So I was redirected to the list to discuss
http://tracker.firebirdsql.org/browse/CORE-4467.
What I can add is that it occurred to me to run a validation on
Hi. Today, the users of one of my Firebird 2.5 databases reported that
the database works very slow. After I checked I saw that there is an
attachment from SWEEPER user and it is doing something. The database size
is little over 500 MB. But the sweeper is working over 2 hours now, with no
I have set up a server connection on the client (server name - server, host -
\\server, port- 3050) and registered the database (name - DB, path -
\\server\, user - sysdba, password - masterkey).
Try with the connection string:
Server:c:\data\db.fdb
_
.
Jesus Garcia
there are comments, some recent,
that changing metadata while users connected can cause database corruption.
Of course, If object in use raises, is not a problem, only if the database stay
in the prior state after the error, but is a problem if trying to drop a table
can cause database corruption.
Jesus Garcia
Hello, Kjell, do you know the source of the issue?
Is a reproducible error in engine what have caused the corruption?
Jesus García
Then, If it were only a firebird issue, all of us would have the problem.
If some of us has the problem, may be an incompatibility between FB, OS and
hardware.
Perhaps, if we share information about our environments, the common origin of
the problem would arise.
Jesus Angel Garcia Zarco
'So the only effective solution seems to disable the random access request
(i.e. remove the FILE_FLAG_RANDOM_ACCESS flag) from the Windows API calls
used to create/open the files. Moreover, in this case the file-system cache
size limit should not be actual anymore, as Windows won't be
2014/1/15 fabianoas...@gmail.com
Increase database page buffers and try again.
It happens when you combine a large table with multiple indexes.
Dropping one or two indices can also increase speed a lot in this case.
I think, 100 million records are not so much records, and If you use
El 22/07/2013, a las 14:10, trskopo trsk...@yahoo.com escribió:
Dear all,
Today, I faced same problem again, which is Firebird server became not
responsive.
Here are the latest settings :
- win 7 64 bit
- Firebirds 2.5.1 super server
- page size 8192
- page buffer 8192
- no long
El 15/07/2013, a las 18:23, trskopo trsk...@yahoo.com escribió:
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Jesús García jegaza@... wrote:
El 15/07/2013, a las 16:31, trskopo trskopo@... escribió:
Hi all,
I have Superserver Firebird 2.5.1 installed on Win7 pro 64 bit on I7
Hello, I think you have a row with null value. The option is update table
set column = 0 where column is null and then try to backup restore. I have
seen this issue when changing columns from null to not null and you have
rows in the table.
2013/6/25 Tupy... nambá anhangu...@yahoo.com
**
it seems possible and desirable to have 2 Servers, one for long running
reports (probably using Classic) and another for the other tasks (using
SuperServer)
Is that right?
Classic server can't open a database opened by superserver, because SS opens it
exclusive mode.
May be the article
Hello I have all my apps in Delphi with the IBX components and ClientDataSets
to conect with a FB Database. Since long time ago IBX creator says it doesn't
support FB. So far I can work with very simple queries fine. But now I'd like
to use a component which supports FB.
I'd like to
Firebird can handle more than 10 concurent users here is an example with
a production system http://www.firebirdnews.org/?p=6797
__,_._,_
There are not 10 concurrent users, are 10 end users using 2500 pooled
connections, then there are 2500 concurrent users máximum., that are
This is also possible, but only if you migrate not to the official
v2.5.2 release but to some earlier snapshot build.
Dmitry
One question Dimitry. We have some quite large databases and cannot do a
backup restore cycle. Also rebuild indices may take so much time.
What kind of indices has to
How many simultaneous users?
What database size?
How complex is metadata?
El 27/09/2012, a las 17:08, Ann Harrison aharri...@ibphoenix.com escribió:
Page type 5 is a data page. What you ran into was an internal deadlock
that was recognized and your process lost. The problem was entirely in
memory, so no, I wouldn't worry about datbase corruption. In theory,
60 transactions / day, uniformly distributed means ~ 7 transactions
per second, which is nothing. I'm sure you don't have that pattern in
production, thus e.g. the most busy hour in respect to transaction
throughput might be interesting.
I know 7 transactions seconds and peaks of 20/30
2012/7/10 Danie van Eeden vaneeden.da...@gmail.com
**
I will connect to security2.fdb to locate the users table and will post
If I have trouble
I think you can't connect no more to security2.fdb with firebird 2.5. You
will have to get users trough API.
Regards, Jesus
[Non-text portions
The Trace API is an underestimated new feature in 2.5, but a godsend to
analyze such situations.
I must say I have used the lite version of your fbtracemanager tool.
Sounds a bit like running the query in a transaction with auto commit
turned on. You might see COMMIT_RETAIN in the trace
Hello, i'm using Firebird 2.5.2 Superclassic in windows 2008 R2 64 bits.
The system runs for two days, and i have seen in firebird log this entries
in the first work day:
Thu Jul 05 11:52:59 2012
Database: Gestlab
page 1296554, page type 4 lock denied (216)
Thu Jul 05 13:36:41 2012
Database:
Two days ago, we moved from one server with interbase 2009 windows 2003 and
4 Gb RAM to Firebird 2.5.2 Superclassic, 16 Gb RAM
The database is around 21 Gb, and yesterday seems all was running fine.
Today, i have checked Firebird.log and i have seen that there is an error
of type
1296554 page
What is the memory consumption?
I have had the same error When firebird reach near 2 gb RAM.
Jesus Angel Garcia Zarco
Cointec
Correo Móvil
El 07/06/2012, a las 11:38, Michael Vilhelmsen
michael.vilhelm...@microcom.dk escribió:
I have a server running windows 2003 32 bits.
On this server
I also have seen that in ERRLOG table you have the entry
DT USR MSG ERR_AT
29/04/2012 x!JKmn validation error for column ID_DIV_LC, value *** null
*** 29/04/2012 17:00:02
Regards, Jesus
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Hello, Tiberiu!
Friday, March 30, 2012, 12:13:06 PM, you wrote:
TH which) somehow foods my server. While this client is using my
TH software, somehow the gap between OIT and NT increases 200 transactions
each 5 seconds. I
Other people noted lot of things, but I want to ask - what
Sorry guys, I don't believe in magic or some spy applications, that
suddenly generates lot of transactions.
One of the cases like that, when some application started to generate
millions transaction per day, was the programmer's fault, when
he forgot to construct web page content from the
Hello, i'm trying to understand the memory usage with classic server 2.5.2,
cache pages 300.
Our production database, once one form is opened, uses 12 Kb memory,
and the memory is allocated the first time a form that open a set of tables
that is related with many other tables in the database
The thing with SC is, when something bad happens in a connection, which
crashes the server, e.g. due to a bug in the engine or a faulty UDF, all
connections are affected. This is probably the reason why people still
prefer Classic over SC. SC might be easier to manage, because you only
see
Just found a remote database that did not have a field in a table which
had been added some 4 or so scripts ago. That makes me suspect of all
script updates.
What is the fastest and most reliable way to check all my deployed
databases (say 200 of them) to see if all the scripts have run
Hi Sean,
I have just installed FB 2.5.1, but the problem still exists. Haven't the
bug been fixed in FB 2.5.1?
Regards
Guido
I opened the ticket, but i have not tested if it really solves the problem.
When i opened the ticket, fb2.5 uses 47% more RAM than 2.1.4, now
(2.5.1,2.5.2) uses
What is the value of mmbtu?
Jesus Angel Garcia Zarco
Cointec
Correo Móvil
El 24/10/2011, a las 17:18, Alan J Davies alan.dav...@aldis-systems.co.uk
escribió:
Hi, has there been a change in the way division is done since FB 2.1
I realise I may be asking this question in the wrong list, but
Hello, is normal to crash the engine whe an exception is raised inside a udf
dll or must be catch by the engine?
I had a udf with the function power. If i call power with a negative valué in
the base parameter an exception is raised and the engine is stopped. Why not
catch the exception To
In Firebird 2.5 release note, I read this note :
The default CpuAffinity setting still binds SuperServer to a single
processor only. In order to take advantage
of this improvement when working with multiple databases, this setting should
be changed in
firebird.conf
It means,
52 matches
Mail list logo