[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread raja_s_patil
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Dmitry Kuzmenko wrote: > > Hello, raja_s_patil! > > Saturday, October 8, 2011, 9:37:06 AM, you wrote: > > r> client wants to stick to FB at Branches for sure. But for centralized > r> database they have doubt that whether it will sustain the volume of 1

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread samcarleton
raja_s_patil, Someone else seemed to already have replied with the core questions you asked, but there is something you stated which I am finding out in my world is a HUGE question and possible show stopper: -:> Now Client wants to have centralized database with two way Replication at HO. Hav

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread raja_s_patil
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "samcarleton" wrote: > > raja_s_patil, > > Someone else seemed to already have replied with the core questions you > asked, but there is something you stated which I am finding out in my world > is a HUGE question and possible show stopper: > > -:> No

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-09 Thread raja_s_patil
Thanks Helen Borrie, --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie wrote: > > And to R. S. Patil, we have hijacked your thread and for this, I apologise. > No need of apologies, In fact I feel privileged when Person like you answer my queries. You people have done lot of work to help

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-09 Thread raja_s_patil
Thanks Thomas Steinmaure, > > For database standby and/or one-way replication requirements you could > also try IB LogManager and it's addons. A video on how this works > together is available here: > http://www.iblogmanager.com/download/demos/iblm/iblm_hotstandby.htm > I will keep in mind th

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-09 Thread Aage Johansen
Sam wrote: << ... Take a look at the Synchronization Example at the bottom of this link: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/sync/bb821992 It explains the basic concept of how Sync Framework syncs the data. The whole key to it is the "Update Tick Count" which is database wide. In the Microsoft worl

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-10 Thread raja_s_patil
Thanks Sudheer, > > Pls have a look at the open source project > http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using this > for the last 2 years > with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You can sync both ways, HO > to branch as well as branch to HO. > Yet a

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-10 Thread raja_s_patil
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote: > > >>Pls have a look at the open source project > >> http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using > >> this > >> for the last 2 years > >> with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You

[firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-11 Thread raja_s_patil
Thanks Sudheer Palaparambil for such elaborate explanation. I am surely going to evaluate this since it seems to be promising. This week we are collecting requirements From client and decide which, where and How tables are to be replicated. Today we discussed gross level requirements which

Re: [firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-08 Thread Helen Borrie
At 02:45 PM 9/10/2011, raja_s_patil wrote: >We have decided to tryout IBPhoenix IBreplicator for this. For me also this is >First Kind of Task. We thought that deciding would be Database size is First >Step then checking which RDBMS will support is Next. Now since FB 2.5 seems to >be OK so we w

Re: [firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-09 Thread Thomas Steinmaurer
> --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "samcarleton" wrote: >> >> raja_s_patil, >> >> Someone else seemed to already have replied with the core questions you >> asked, but there is something you stated which I am finding out in my world >> is a HUGE question and possible show stopper: >> >>

Re: [firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-09 Thread Sudheer Palaparambil
Hi Friends, Pls have a look at the open source project http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using this for the last 2 years with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You can sync both ways, HO to branch as well as branch to HO. Regards. Sudheer Pa

Re: [firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-10 Thread Thomas Steinmaurer
>>Pls have a look at the open source project >> http://symmetricds.codehaus.org/ for synchronization. I have been using this >> for the last 2 years >> with Firebird database. This works fantastically. You can sync both ways, HO >> to branch as well as branch to HO. >> > > Yet another optio

Re: [firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-10 Thread Sudheer Palaparambil
Hi, SymmetricDS is an asynchronous data replication software package that supports multiple subscribers and bi-directional synchronization. It uses web and database technologies to replicate tables between relational databases, in near real time if desired. The software was designed to scale for a

Re: [firebird-support] Re: FB suitability for Consolidated Database of 15 GB.

2011-10-11 Thread Sudheer Palaparambil
Hi, Definitely, if you have all the columns in the branch table defined in HO table. Regards. Sudheer P On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:23 PM, raja_s_patil wrote: > ** > > > > Thanks Sudheer Palaparambil for such elaborate explanation. > > I am surely going to evaluate this since it seems to