Dear colleagues,
Perhaps, I misread or misunderstand some of these discussions, but it seems
to me having read Conrad that in the background their philosophy is
cosmological or, in other words, an attempt to ground bits in it. I
understand that it is considered as a fluctuon and no lon
Forwarded message, From Jamie Rose
De
James Rose
Fecha
Fri, 15 Oct 2010 06:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
A
fis@listas.unizar.es
CC
ro...@home.ease.lsoft.com
Asunto
Re: [Fis] Recapping the discussion? Joseph's Recap
And not to be overlooked is Robert Rosen's extensivework identifying and
I would like to comment upon Conrad's statement:
"When we look at a biological system we are looking at the face of the
> underlying physics of the universe... The picture is not one of
> simple upscale percolation. The higher levels act down scale on the
> lower levels to redefine their fundament
Dear Pedro,
Thank you for calling my attention and that of the Group to Conrad's vision
and this most important quotation. It is certainly congenial to my logical
system, in which downward causation, imperfect circularity and
self-inconsistency are accepted as a matter of course and assigned their
Dear Joseph and FIS colleagues,
"When we look at a biological system we are looking at the face of the
underlying physics of the universe... The picture is not one of of
simple upscale percolation. The higher levels act down scale on the
lower levels to redefine their fundamental characteristic
