Quoting Loet Leydesdorff :
>
> Because it is essentially a mathematical theory, information theory,
> in my opinion, can be made relevant (that is, provided with meaning)
> in all kind of contexts, and these various contexts can be used to
> formalize mechanisms which can then be more abstra
..@nifty.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 1:53 PM
To: 'Loet Leydesdorff'; joe.bren...@bluewin.ch; pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es;
fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: RE: [Fis] The world of singularities, beyond language. Necessity and
Sufficiency
Dear Loet and All,
Your remark “what i
Dear Loet and All,
Your remark “what is communicated and why?” sounds suggestive in many
respects. If the question is paraphrased into “what is communicated by what?”,
the perennially perplexing issue of what is time would come up to the surface
once again since the temporality of communi
: pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es; fis@listas.unizar.es
Subject: [Fis] The world of singularities, beyond language. Necessity and
Sufficiency
Dear Pedro and All,
Pedro is correct in calling our attention to a Neurodynamic Central Theory
(NCT) as a necessary, essential component of a proper Theory of
ntific findings, but insists they must inform one another.
Thank you and best wishes,
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Datum: 06.05.2011 13:59
An:
Betreff: [Fis] The world of singularities, beyond language
Dear Joseph and colleagues,
In some importan
rward to the Taborsky opus to
help develop this approach.
Best regards,
Joseph
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Datum: 05.05.2011 14:36
An:
Betreff: [Fis] The world of singularities, beyond language - John
Collier
Message from Joh
processes, his "Logic of Energy" (1951), may be required. I am looking forward
to the Taborsky opus to help develop this approach.
Best regards,
Joseph
Ursprüngliche Nachricht
Von: pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Datum: 05.05.2011 14:36
An:
Betreff: [Fis] The world of singularit
Participants are reminded the rule of only two messages per week!!
---Pedro
Rafael Capurro escribió:
well... not exactly. This is the way Hegel (and others) looked at it,
discarding the 'singulars' or including them into the particulars and so
creating a dialectics of the universal and the par
well... not exactly. This is the way Hegel (and others) looked at it,
discarding the 'singulars' or including them into the particulars and so
creating a dialectics of the universal and the particular. Kierkegaard
was not at all happy with this. What I am trying to say (quoting Octavio
Paz) is
Dear Rafael & Gordana,
What we are discussing here is the difference between universals and
particulars. Universal laws can only be stated in terms of universal
variables (mass, energy, etc. The "pleroma" of Bateson). The
particular, the asymmetric, the contingent are all constrained, but
Message from John Colier
Hi all,
This is interesting, as it brings up some ancient issues that continue
to roil philosophy. I think that C.S. Peirce has the best answer to
these puzzles (and does not eliminate the wonder). For his (realist)
pragmatacism
11 matches
Mail list logo
