Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing

2016-10-05 Thread Dai Griffiths
Thanks Mark, I agree with you about I do not believe that we “ought” to change the way we communicate about science because publishers and universities have too much power; that they have too much power is a systemic consequence of something else." I've found Bateson's fragmentary comments o

Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing

2016-10-05 Thread Rafael Capurro
ology per se may be. Now I'll go off to check out Sci-Hub, ... or maybe I'll wait until I leave the office and get home. Dai ________ From: Fis [fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] on behalf of Loet Leydesdorff [l...@leydesdorff.net] Sent: 27 September 2016 08:27 To: 'M

Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing

2016-10-05 Thread Loet Leydesdorff
05, 2016 10:04 AM To: fis Subject: Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing Dear Sergej, Rafeal, Loet, Dai and list, First of all, thank you very much for the references – Gieryn looks fascinating (thanks Loet), and I will check out the Hobart and Schiffman (thanks to Pedro). It a

Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing

2016-10-05 Thread Mark Johnson
#x27;ll wait until I leave > the office and get home. > > Dai > > >> >> >> From: Fis [fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] on behalf of Loet Leydesdorff >> [l...@leydesdorff.net] >> Sent: 27 September 2016 08:27 >>

Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing

2016-10-03 Thread Dai Griffiths
behalf of Loet Leydesdorff [l...@leydesdorff.net] Sent: 27 September 2016 08:27 To: 'Moisés André Nisenbaum'; 'Mark Johnson'; 'fis' Subject: Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing Dear Mark, Moises, and colleagues, I agree that this is a very beautiful piece of wo

Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing

2016-09-30 Thread Pedro C. Marijuan
Dear Mark and Colleagues, Thanks for the well crafted work. Actually you have presented us a tightly linked work along perspectives of philosophical, historical, and present day criticisms stances. For my taste, Sections 1 and 2 are a matter of opinion, of philosophical orientation, closer in

Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing

2016-09-27 Thread Francesco Rizzo
ng Professor, Birkbeck, University of London; > http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en > > > -Original Message- > From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Moisés André > Nisenbaum > Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 1:45 AM > To: Ma

Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing

2016-09-27 Thread Loet Leydesdorff
tations?user=ych9gNYJ&hl=en -Original Message- From: Fis [mailto:fis-boun...@listas.unizar.es] On Behalf Of Moisés André Nisenbaum Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 1:45 AM To: Mark Johnson Cc: fis Subject: Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing Dear Mark. Thank y

Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing

2016-09-26 Thread Moisés André Nisenbaum
Dear Mark. Thank you for the excelent video and article. It is very important to discuss this and, if you agree, I will use your video with my students (can you send me the transcription?). No doubt we are in a changing world and we have to fight against abusive processes, like publication industr

Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing

2016-09-26 Thread Rafael Capurro
Dear Mark, thanks for your inspiring and indeed provocative presentation. Just some few remarks/questions about: 1) was it since the 16th and 17th century also a nationalistic issue when claiming who was the first one to have done a 'discovery' and is it in a different way still today? Do you k

Re: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing. Please resend article.

2016-09-26 Thread Joseph Brenner
son" To: "fis" Sent: Monday, September 26, 2016 9:55 AM Subject: [Fis] Scientific Communication and Publishing Dear FIS Colleagues, To kick-start the discussion on scientific publishing, I have prepared a short (hopefully provocative) video. It can be found at: https://www.youtub