e your favorite poison, but it seems to me that the evidences we have
> support much more mechanism than materialism.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>> I apologize for the delayed response.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Emanuel.
>>
>>
>
: howlbl...@aol.com [mailto:howlbl...@aol.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 3:52 AM
To: emanl@gmail.com; jerry_lr_chand...@me.com; pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Cc: fis@listas.unizar.es; witz...@sbg.at
Subject: Re: [Fis] FIS newcomer
re: cognitive biology vs computational biology.
may i suggest that you
m]
Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 3:52 AM
To: emanl@gmail.com; jerry_lr_chand...@me.com; pcmarijuan.i...@aragon.es
Cc: fis@listas.unizar.es; witz...@sbg.at
Subject: Re: [Fis] FIS newcomer
re: cognitive biology vs computational biology.
may i suggest that you add yet one more ap
;> Computational linguistics and so on are now being replaced with Cognitive
>>>> biology, Cognitive ecology, Cognitive neuroscience, Cognitive genomics,
>>>> Cognitive endocrinology, Cognitive intelligence, Cognitive linguistics,
>>>> and even Cognitive computing).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> By definition, com
ostulates.
Best regards,
Emanuel Diamant.
From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@me.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:42 PM
To: Emanuel Diamant
Subject: Re: [Fis] FIS newcomer
Dear Emanuel:
Thanks for posting your views on Research Gate.
Interesting perspective
ive data processing,
>>> while Cognitive approaches imply dedicated information processing. What is
>>> the difference? Unfortunately, FIS forum does not dwell on this issue.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I was pleased to hear from Prof. Kun Wu (at his opening lecture in Vienna)
>>> that “By means of the reformation,
l domains
>> are facing an integrative trend of paradigm reform, which I name as
>> “informationalization of science”, (The quotation is from one of his
>> presentation slides).
>>
>>
>>
>> As you can see, my assertions are very close to what Prof. Kun Wu claims,
>> but far from what you (and other mainstream FIS contributors
er mainstream FIS contributors) obey and adhere to.
>
>
>
> I am a newcomer to FIS and I do not intend to preach in the others’ temple.
> But Prof. Kun Wu is one of the founding fathers of the Philosophy of
> Information. Therefore, it would be wise for you to be in an agreem
rmation. Therefore, it would be wise for you to be in an agreement with
his
postulates.
Best regards,
Emanuel Diamant.
From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@me.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:42 PM
To: Emanuel Diamant
Subject: Re: [Fis] FIS newcomer
Dear Emanuel:
an agreement with
his postulates.
Best regards,
Emanuel Diamant.
From: Jerry LR Chandler [mailto:jerry_lr_chand...@me.com]
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 8:42 PM
To: Emanuel Diamant
Subject: Re: [Fis] FIS newcomer
Dear Emanuel:
Thanks for posting your views on Res
10 matches
Mail list logo
