On 10/30/06, Philip Ganchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/30/06, Martin Bähr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:44:45PM +0100, Axel Liljencrantz wrote:
> > > Not sure that's a good idea. For example, when you are searching the
> > > history, if you come across a multilin
On 10/30/06, Martin Bähr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:44:45PM +0100, Axel Liljencrantz wrote:
> > Not sure that's a good idea. For example, when you are searching the
> > history, if you come across a multiline entry, you will be stuck.
>
> not really.
> you only have to
On 10/30/06, Martin Bähr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:44:45PM +0100, Axel Liljencrantz wrote:
> > Not sure that's a good idea. For example, when you are searching the
> > history, if you come across a multiline entry, you will be stuck.
>
> not really.
> you only have to
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 04:44:45PM +0100, Axel Liljencrantz wrote:
> Not sure that's a good idea. For example, when you are searching the
> history, if you come across a multiline entry, you will be stuck.
not really.
you only have to hit the arrow a few more times to get to the next
entry.
the cu
On 10/29/06, Martin Bähr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> i was just going through the wishlist and i noticed that there are
> items that can actually be removed since they have been implemented.
> (how nice is that? :-)
:)
>
> that said, there is one item, that i think would make sense for t
