Re: [Fish-users] Fish Shell adoption / random comments

On 11-07-07 06:24 PM, SanskritFritz wrote: On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Patrick Mc(avery > wrote: P.S Still have not heard back from Alex, he is alive making commits on github What's his nick on github? Sorry I screwed up, it's Axel not A

Re: [Fish-users] Fish Shell adoption / random comments

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Patrick Mc(avery < patr...@spellingbeewinnars.org> wrote: > P.S Still have not heard back from Alex, he is alive making commits on > github > What's his nick on github? -- All of the data

Re: [Fish-users] fish and scp wildcards

On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 5:55 PM, Kristleifur Daðason wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:37 PM, SanskritFritz > wrote: >> >>> Hi guys and gals, >>> i wonder if there is any chance to implement wildcards (*) into >>> the functionality of fish when using scp? >>> this works in bash: >>> $ scp usern.

Re: [Fish-users] Fish Shell adoption / random comments

On 11-07-07 05:45 PM, Philip Ganchev wrote: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Patrick Mc(avery > wrote: > > [...] >> How about something like this for a description: >> >> Fish allows for shell scripting with a modern, intuitive syntax. You can do >> nearly everything that you can do in a standar

Re: [Fish-users] Fish Shell adoption / random comments

On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Patrick Mc(avery wrote: [...] > How about something like this for a description: > > Fish allows for shell scripting with a modern, intuitive syntax. You can do > nearly everything that you can do in a standard POSIX shell with Fish but > due to the friendly syntax

Re: [Fish-users] Friendly sed project idea feedback

Hi Jan Thanks for the feedback and advice. I am actually really only interested in fish for writing scripts, I think this is where the syntax really shines and hopefully this is the place for verbose but easy to read code. I don't know sed that well so writing a wrapper will teach me about it

Re: [Fish-users] Friendly sed project idea feedback

Hi Patrick, I agree with you that, like bash, sed syntax could use an improvement (and so could awk, find, and other unix utilities from the old days). For syntax, there are several properties that can be traded off: consistency, readability, succinctness, and probably others. Lack of consistency

[Fish-users] Friendly sed project idea feedback

Hi Everyone I am only an enthusiast programmer and truthfully I have not done much with shell scripting, before realized what fish was about the syntax freaked me out. Sed also freaks me out, again due to the syntax. Do you think it would be in keeping with the goals of fish to create a wrapper

Re: [Fish-users] scp remote tab completion

On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 4:09 AM, i...@whywouldwe.com wrote: > This is slightly related to the other > thread currently being discussed 'fish > and scp wildcards', but different > enought to warrant its own thread. > > I recall about 8 months ago on this list > someone said that zsh had remote tab >