Kudo's and Grow up!!

This message is from: Beverly Weston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> First I would like to congratulate Vivian and Shiloh for doing the breed proud and putting some of those critics mouths to rest!!! I hear it all the time when I have my guy out in the world and it does become amusing after awhile especially

hear hear

This message is from: "Ursula & Brian Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 'I have not heard anyone say that the purpose of evaluating those stallions is to limit the gene pool. Instead I am hearing them say it is to improve a breeders' tools for selection. ' thank you, thank you thank you TamaraAND

RE: Bees

This message is from: "The Mercers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Serve them a deep pan of beer. Also, put some big goldfish in your water tank. Taffy in 100*+ Kennewick, WA

Cool it Right Now!

This message is from: Steve McIlree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> It appears it is time to ask some List members to cool it. The discussion about evaluations and over-selection is becoming too heated. Any more comments and I will have to enforce my request that this topic be dropped. -- Steve McIl

Re: Evaluations and other things

This message is from: "Mike May, Registrar NFHR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> At 05:36 PM 8/8/2005, you wrote: This message is from: "Ron & Sherrie Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Next I have a question about bees and stock tanks, we're having a real problem with the bees and our horses stock tanks. I eve

Evaluations and other things

This message is from: "Ron & Sherrie Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi all, I guess I missed something, I don't remember ever hearing or reading that having stallions or mares evaluated would lead to a shrinking of the gene pool. If the information from the evaluated horses is used as an Educationa

food for thought

This message is from: "Warren Stockwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A quote from the Minutes " The board discussed a members proposal that every stallion be evaluated. The consensus of the board was that such a recommendation needs additional study and was tabled for the time being." Bully for the board

Libby info

This message is from: Lauren Sellars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hello List I am surprised not to find Libby show under the schedualed events on our NFHR site. I would like to get the show package please.Whom should I contact. P.S I love the letters of riding and fun.Our greatest pleasure at this time

evaluation

This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I just want to tell everyone that I went to a meeting about the Evaluation in Fallbrook, CA and it sounds like it is going to be a lot of fun. Beginners are welcome. The Vestlandshest USA Club are working very hard to make it a very friendly fun experien

disgusted

This message is from: "Warren Stockwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> There is a lot of educational food for thought on this list if those of you who will remain nameless will cut out the hot air and personal attaches! I for one have gotten lots of education and have been doing some information searching

Re: genetics discussion - not inflammatory.

This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maybe just a few comments to put somethings into perspective and put a little oil on the waters. The diversity of the gene pool of the Fjord horse is by definition limited , since outbreeding is not allowed. Luckily it is a pretty healthy one to all app

good ole' fjords

This message is from: "Linda Lottie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi Listers! It is so darn hot in western WI today. I and my dogs are holed up in my office with the air blasting. So sick of this heat! Anyway, wanted to share a fjord story with you. Last weekend Kristin Lee and her

Re: over-selection apples and eval oranges

This message is from: "Warren Stockwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Original Message - From: "Tamara Rousso" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2005 6:47 PM Subject: over-selection apples and eval oranges . I'm jumping into > the fray which means no matter what I say you (Rut

Re: genetics discussion - not inflammatory.

This message is from: "Warren Stockwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thank You!!! Kathy in so Idaho Roberta

Mariposa Farm

This message is from: "Ruth Bushnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark, I did not and will not attribute any statement to yourself other than what you have already said on this list. I would readily retract any misquote if I only knew what it was? Why would I leave the list when I have tried very hard t

Re:Ruth

This message is from: Mariposa Farm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This message is from: "Ruth Bushnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This message is from: Mariposa Farm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ruth, I never suggested what you stated below. Would you please retract the statement. > Mark McGinley That your sugg

Re: fjordhorse-digest V2005 #175

This message is from: "jgayle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> All of this talk about trying to make the breed better or more intelligent, workable etc. seems to me the best example of what can happen is shown in our politicians!!! Jean G. Author 'The Colonel's Daughter" Occupied Germany 1946 to 1

Re: Burning question for Ruthie

This message is from: "John & Eunice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Regardless of what anyone has said -- topics or statements criticized or commented on -- no one should EVER, EVER be compared to Osama Bin Laden. Gayle -- within your question <<> has to be one of the worst "put downs" I have read on the F

Re: fjordhorse-digest V2005 #175

This message is from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In a message dated 8/7/2005 9:33:39 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Another key issue that you failed to recognize is the fact that we are the only country in the world at this point in time, that is striving to preserve the dr

Herald

This message is from: "Reena Giola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Is this the Spring issue of the Herald? I hope I get a copy of it. I know I wasn't eligible for the winter one. How do we check if we are on the list to receive it? Reena

Re: burning question

This message is from: "Ruth Bushnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This message is from: Mariposa Farm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Ruth, > > I never suggested what you stated below. Would you please retract the > statement. > Mark McGinley That your suggestion of evaluating all stallions leads to a narrow

Reference the "new" Herald

This message is from: M Korose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Hi lIst Sandy (and Beth, I am sure there is enuf work there for a crowd!) I am so glad you stepped up to the Herald. It has always been a favorite of mine for years, I read it AS SOON as it hits the table. I have submitted articles and been t

Re: Burning Question

This message is from: Mariposa Farm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ruth, I never suggested what you stated below. Would you please retract the statement. Mis-stating facts doesn't help your argument much. "I have offered professional resources and contacts to anyone that is interested in determining w