This message is from: ruth bushnell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wouldn't know phenotypical vs genotypical .or any of that speak.
The QH changed because of fashion It's a lesson to be
learned by NFHR,
hopefully by virtue of our small size in membership we can hold together
the true
This message is from: Jean Ernest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, but if a horse has poor conformation, or major defects in it's
structure that make it uncomfortable to be ridden , etc., then their
temperament, while genetypically good, kind and gentle, might become
ornery due to pain and discomfort.
This message is from: Gail Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or...Like Gunthar...one who is the sweetest horse in the world, but is
frightened when he canters because of his lack of balance.
gail
This message is from: Jean Ernest [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, but if a horse has poor conformation, or major
This message is from: Pat Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ruthie wrote:
The QH is where it's at today because of eye
pleasing phenotypical decisions made in the past, with little or no regard
to genotypical thought... sound familiar?
Evaluations will in no way prevent inbreeding, on the contrary,
4 matches
Mail list logo