Re: [flac-dev] [Flac-dev] Git branch with compiling fixes for win32

2012-05-04 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
El 03/05/12 12:19, Miroslav Lichvar escribió: Hi Josh, nice to see you here again. On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:26:05PM -0700, Josh Coalson wrote: (Jumping in again, maybe at the wrong point since this doesn't seem to involve encoding, but here goes.) Miroslav's patches have always been

Re: [flac-dev] [Flac-dev] Git branch with compiling fixes for win32

2012-05-04 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
El 03/05/12 12:19, Miroslav Lichvar escribió: It makes the C function faster than the corresponding asm routine, so if it's included I'd suggest to just drop the asm function to not keep around more asm code than is necessary. With current compilers it is very likely that those routines are

Re: [flac-dev] [Flac-dev] Git branch with compiling fixes for win32

2012-05-04 Thread Miroslav Lichvar
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:13:05AM -0400, Cristian Rodríguez wrote: Both Erick and I did already submitted patches to the tree that do just exactly what your flac-1.2.1-bitreader.patch intended.. please checkout current GIT tree. The most interesting part of the patch is the rewrite of the

Re: [flac-dev] [Flac-dev] Git branch with compiling fixes for win32

2012-05-04 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
El 04/05/12 11:53, Miroslav Lichvar escribió: On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:13:05AM -0400, Cristian Rodríguez wrote: Both Erick and I did already submitted patches to the tree that do just exactly what your flac-1.2.1-bitreader.patch intended.. please checkout current GIT tree. The most

Re: [flac-dev] [Flac-dev] Git branch with compiling fixes for win32

2012-05-04 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
El 04/05/12 12:09, Miroslav Lichvar escribió: On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 05:53:23PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: The most interesting part of the patch is the rewrite of the FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed_block function, which in the git repo seems to have only couple lines changed since