Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.2 has been released

2017-01-01 Thread MauritsVB
> On 1 Jan 2017, at 07:54, lvqcl.mail wrote: > > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > >> I also notice that on sourceforge: >> >>https://sourceforge.net/projects/flac/files/flac-win/ >> >> there are still 1000+ downloads per week 1.2.1 windows binaries >> with know security holes. What do people

Re: [flac-dev] 1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)

2016-12-24 Thread MauritsVB
Over on Hydrogenaudio "o-l-a-v" has tested 1.3.1 against 1.3.2pre3 on Windows 10 Pro x64. The conclusion is: no errors, 1.3.2pre3 seems to produce slightly smaller files but is also slightly slower with encoding. https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,113190.msg932918.html#msg932918 Maurits

[flac-dev] 1.3.2 News announcement

2016-12-08 Thread MauritsVB
If I recall correctly, with the release of 1.3.1 there were a few days between the version being released and the News and Changelog appearing on the site. This caused a number of sites to report the release without mentioning all the improvements in the update. Can I suggest that this time we

Re: [flac-dev] Some additions for the 1.3.2 changelog?

2016-12-06 Thread MauritsVB
> On 6 Dec 2016, at 09:07, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > Wow, thanks for this. Really helpful to have someone else do something > I was dreading :). You’re more than welcome. Thanks for all your work pushing this through. > On 6 Dec 2016, at 09:20, Ozkan Sezer wrote: > > I suggest mentionin

[flac-dev] Some additions for the 1.3.2 changelog?

2016-12-05 Thread MauritsVB
Hi Erik, I noticed you’ve started compiling the changelog for 1.3.2. I have kept track of some of the bigger changes since 1.3.1 although admittedly haven’t been on top of it this year. Perhaps some of these older ones are useful to consider including: Fixed a segmentation fault in libFLAC htt

Re: [flac-dev] Performance tests

2016-02-03 Thread MauritsVB
Hi Martijn, I don’t know if it’s just my Firefox or whether something breaks during the parsing of the email but none of your links seem to work for me. I feel it might have something to do with the spaces in the file names of the PDFs, which doesn’t translate well to URLs. Thanks, Lennard >

Re: [flac-dev] Lets do a 1.3.2 release

2016-01-08 Thread MauritsVB
Great stuff! For the checklist, can I suggest you also make sure all resulting FLAC files are encoded with the new date in their encoder string? As for the changelog, I have kept track of those changes that might be more interesting for end-users and developers using the format (so no build-sy

Re: [flac-dev] Strange things happening at SourceForge

2015-05-28 Thread MauritsVB
On 28 May 2015, at 12:27, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> The response from SF suggests that it’s non-responsiveness from the >> original project owner. Hopefully it’s limited to that. > > Well for flac, thats Josh who has been non-responsive since

Re: [flac-dev] Strange things happening at SourceForge

2015-05-28 Thread MauritsVB
> MauritsVB wrote: > >> Ars Technica reports of ‘abandoned projects’ on SourceForge being taken >> over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables. >> >> This might be something to be wary of with FLAC considering the main focus >> for FLAC ha

[flac-dev] Strange things happening at SourceForge

2015-05-28 Thread MauritsVB
Ars Technica reports of ‘abandoned projects’ on SourceForge being taken over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables. arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/05/sourceforge-grabs-gimp-for-windows-account-wraps-installer-in-bundle-pushing-adware/ This might be something to b

Re: [flac-dev] [PATCH] Updating the ReplayGain documentation

2015-01-26 Thread MauritsVB
Apologies, there appears to have been a spacing issue in two of the patches. Attached are the fixed ones. Maurits main-v2.patch Description: Binary data metaflac-v2.patch Description: Binary data On 25 Jan 2015, at 01:01, MauritsVB wrote: > In this topic on Hydrogen > Audi

[flac-dev] [PATCH] Updating the ReplayGain documentation

2015-01-24 Thread MauritsVB
In this topic on Hydrogen Audio(http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=105586) someone asked a question about the sample rates that FLAC supports for ReplayGain. The outcome was that the current documentation of MetaFLAC is outdated since Commit http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=

Re: [flac-dev] Parts of the standard not supported in reference decoder?

2014-12-13 Thread MauritsVB
On 12 Dec 2014, at 18:05, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > Op 12-12-14 om 14:25 schreef MauritsVB: >> things that are part of the standard but not supported in the reference >> decoder. I am not looking for things missing from the reference encoder >> (such as variable blo

[flac-dev] Parts of the standard not supported in reference decoder?

2014-12-12 Thread MauritsVB
I am working on creating a set of FLAC files for a ‘decoder compliance test corpus’ and am looking for examples of things that are part of the standard but not supported in the reference decoder. I am not looking for things missing from the reference encoder (such as variable block sizes). I se

[flac-dev] Foobar and XLD have updated to FLAC 1.3.1

2014-11-30 Thread MauritsVB
Foobar has been updated to version 1.3.6, the only change is that it now uses FLAC 1.3.1. (http://www.foobar2000.org/download) XLD has been updated to version 20141129 and now uses FLAC 1.3.1. (http://tmkk.undo.jp/xld/index_e.html) ___ flac-dev mailing

Re: [flac-dev] Xiph and Sourceforge downloads sections

2014-11-30 Thread MauritsVB
, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > >> MauritsVB wrote: >> >>> Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page >>> https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads >>> on Sourcefor

[flac-dev] Xiph and Sourceforge downloads sections

2014-11-27 Thread MauritsVB
Nice work on getting flac 1.3.1 out! Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads on Sourceforge and could use updating to the new binaries. However, if for instance the OS X binary is just aro

Re: [flac-dev] flac-1.3.1pre1

2014-11-25 Thread MauritsVB
On 25 Nov 2014, at 10:58, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> Is there any objection to posting the news about the pre-release in >> this topic on HydrogenAudio >> (http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=101082)? > > > All g

Re: [flac-dev] flac-1.3.1pre1

2014-11-25 Thread MauritsVB
On 25 Nov 2014, at 08:43, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Hi all, > > As people may have seen there's a pre-release here: > >http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ > > Specifically: > >flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code >flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit bi

Re: [flac-dev] flac-1.3.1pre1

2014-11-25 Thread MauritsVB
On 25 Nov 2014, at 08:43, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Hi all, > > As people may have seen there's a pre-release here: > >http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/ > > Specifically: > >flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code >flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit bin

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.1 changelog?

2014-11-24 Thread MauritsVB
On 24 Nov 2014, at 10:13, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> As we’re talking 1.3.1 release, I’ve been keeping track of a couple of >> changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might >> as well share here. The things between brac

Re: [flac-dev] New release

2014-11-23 Thread MauritsVB
On 23 Nov 2014, at 15:06, MauritsVB wrote: > > On 23 Nov 2014, at 14:49, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > >> Considering Windows binaries: in case no new binaries are provided, please >> at least remove the old ones from sourceforge. As can be gleaned from some >> bu

Re: [flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.1 changelog?

2014-11-23 Thread MauritsVB
On 23 Nov 2014, at 14:07, lvqcl wrote: > MauritsVB wrote: > >> As we’re talking 1.3.1 release, I’ve been keeping track of a couple of >> changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might as >> well share here. The things between brackets are

Re: [flac-dev] New release

2014-11-23 Thread MauritsVB
On 23 Nov 2014, at 14:49, Martijn van Beurden wrote: > Considering Windows binaries: in case no new binaries are provided, please at > least remove the old ones from sourceforge. As can be gleaned from some bug > reports, support requests etc. on sourceforge, people are still happily > downlo

[flac-dev] FLAC 1.3.1 changelog?

2014-11-23 Thread MauritsVB
As we’re talking 1.3.1 release, I’ve been keeping track of a couple of changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might as well share here. The things between brackets are just to refresh memories, I’d leave them out of the actual changelog. * Improved efficiency of 24

Re: [flac-dev] New release

2014-11-23 Thread MauritsVB
There have been some offers to help building for various platforms: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-July/004271.html and there was discussion last year to create official ‘blessed builds’, compiled by Xiph for security reasons. http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-July/004