> On 1 Jan 2017, at 07:54, lvqcl.mail wrote:
>
> Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>
>> I also notice that on sourceforge:
>>
>>https://sourceforge.net/projects/flac/files/flac-win/
>>
>> there are still 1000+ downloads per week 1.2.1 windows binaries
>> with know security holes. What do people
Over on Hydrogenaudio "o-l-a-v" has tested 1.3.1 against 1.3.2pre3 on Windows
10 Pro x64.
The conclusion is: no errors, 1.3.2pre3 seems to produce slightly smaller files
but is also slightly slower with encoding.
https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,113190.msg932918.html#msg932918
Maurits
If I recall correctly, with the release of 1.3.1 there were a few days between
the version being released and the News and Changelog appearing on the site.
This caused a number of sites to report the release without mentioning all the
improvements in the update.
Can I suggest that this time we
> On 6 Dec 2016, at 09:07, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>
> Wow, thanks for this. Really helpful to have someone else do something
> I was dreading :).
You’re more than welcome. Thanks for all your work pushing this through.
> On 6 Dec 2016, at 09:20, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>
> I suggest mentionin
Hi Erik,
I noticed you’ve started compiling the changelog for 1.3.2. I have kept track
of some of the bigger changes since 1.3.1 although admittedly haven’t been on
top of it this year. Perhaps some of these older ones are useful to consider
including:
Fixed a segmentation fault in libFLAC
htt
Hi Martijn,
I don’t know if it’s just my Firefox or whether something breaks during the
parsing of the email but none of your links seem to work for me. I feel it
might have something to do with the spaces in the file names of the PDFs, which
doesn’t translate well to URLs.
Thanks,
Lennard
>
Great stuff!
For the checklist, can I suggest you also make sure all resulting FLAC files
are encoded with the new date in their encoder string?
As for the changelog, I have kept track of those changes that might be more
interesting for end-users and developers using the format (so no build-sy
On 28 May 2015, at 12:27, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> MauritsVB wrote:
>
>> The response from SF suggests that it’s non-responsiveness from the
>> original project owner. Hopefully it’s limited to that.
>
> Well for flac, thats Josh who has been non-responsive since
> MauritsVB wrote:
>
>> Ars Technica reports of ‘abandoned projects’ on SourceForge being taken
>> over by SourceForge with adware installers added to executables.
>>
>> This might be something to be wary of with FLAC considering the main focus
>> for FLAC ha
Ars Technica reports of ‘abandoned projects’ on SourceForge being taken over by
SourceForge with adware installers added to executables.
arstechnica.com/information-technology/2015/05/sourceforge-grabs-gimp-for-windows-account-wraps-installer-in-bundle-pushing-adware/
This might be something to b
Apologies, there appears to have been a spacing issue in two of the patches.
Attached are the fixed ones.
Maurits
main-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
metaflac-v2.patch
Description: Binary data
On 25 Jan 2015, at 01:01, MauritsVB wrote:
> In this topic on Hydrogen
> Audi
In this topic on Hydrogen
Audio(http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=105586) someone
asked a question about the sample rates that FLAC supports for ReplayGain.
The outcome was that the current documentation of MetaFLAC is outdated since
Commit
http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=
On 12 Dec 2014, at 18:05, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
> Op 12-12-14 om 14:25 schreef MauritsVB:
>> things that are part of the standard but not supported in the reference
>> decoder. I am not looking for things missing from the reference encoder
>> (such as variable blo
I am working on creating a set of FLAC files for a ‘decoder compliance test
corpus’ and am looking for examples of things that are part of the standard but
not supported in the reference decoder. I am not looking for things missing
from the reference encoder (such as variable block sizes).
I se
Foobar has been updated to version 1.3.6, the only change is that it now uses
FLAC 1.3.1. (http://www.foobar2000.org/download)
XLD has been updated to version 20141129 and now uses FLAC 1.3.1.
(http://tmkk.undo.jp/xld/index_e.html)
___
flac-dev mailing
, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
>
>> MauritsVB wrote:
>>
>>> Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page
>>> https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads
>>> on Sourcefor
Nice work on getting flac 1.3.1 out!
Is there an ETA for any non-Windows binaries in the pipeline? The page
https://www.xiph.org/flac/download.html still points to the 1.2.1 downloads on
Sourceforge and could use updating to the new binaries. However, if for
instance the OS X binary is just aro
On 25 Nov 2014, at 10:58, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> MauritsVB wrote:
>
>> Is there any objection to posting the news about the pre-release in
>> this topic on HydrogenAudio
>> (http://www.hydrogenaud.io/forums/index.php?showtopic=101082)?
>
>
> All g
On 25 Nov 2014, at 08:43, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As people may have seen there's a pre-release here:
>
>http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/
>
> Specifically:
>
>flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code
>flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit bi
On 25 Nov 2014, at 08:43, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As people may have seen there's a pre-release here:
>
>http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/
>
> Specifically:
>
>flac-1.3.1pre1.tar.xz : The source code
>flac-1.3.1pre1-win.zip : Windows 32 and 64 bit bin
On 24 Nov 2014, at 10:13, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> MauritsVB wrote:
>
>> As we’re talking 1.3.1 release, I’ve been keeping track of a couple of
>> changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might
>> as well share here. The things between brac
On 23 Nov 2014, at 15:06, MauritsVB wrote:
>
> On 23 Nov 2014, at 14:49, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
>
>> Considering Windows binaries: in case no new binaries are provided, please
>> at least remove the old ones from sourceforge. As can be gleaned from some
>> bu
On 23 Nov 2014, at 14:07, lvqcl wrote:
> MauritsVB wrote:
>
>> As we’re talking 1.3.1 release, I’ve been keeping track of a couple of
>> changes that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might as
>> well share here. The things between brackets are
On 23 Nov 2014, at 14:49, Martijn van Beurden wrote:
> Considering Windows binaries: in case no new binaries are provided, please at
> least remove the old ones from sourceforge. As can be gleaned from some bug
> reports, support requests etc. on sourceforge, people are still happily
> downlo
As we’re talking 1.3.1 release, I’ve been keeping track of a couple of changes
that I feel should be included in the changelog and that I might as well share
here. The things between brackets are just to refresh memories, I’d leave them
out of the actual changelog.
* Improved efficiency of 24
There have been some offers to help building for various platforms:
http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-July/004271.html and there was
discussion last year to create official ‘blessed builds’, compiled by Xiph for
security reasons. http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-July/004
26 matches
Mail list logo
