Uh... other way around, surely?
var myString:String = "";
myString+=yourXML.toString();
save(myString, "myString.xml");
But Steven's right - that's always worked for me, with no need to use
xmlDecl. I'd never heard of xmlDecl until Wagner mentioned it...
Ian
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 12:18 AM, Stev
Are there any Flash IRC clients that can connect to a real IRC server
network? Preferably skinnable?
Thanks
Elia
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
Not to mention that a programmer who knows AS3, Java, and Lisp is
immensely more valuable than one who just knows AS3. It proves you
have the capacity to learn, which is a very marketable trait.
BS.. Doesn't prove a thing..
Someone who *just* knows AS3 may have - scratch that - *has* the capaci
myString:String = yourXML.toString();
myString += "";
save(myString, "myString.xml");
An XML file is just a text file with a .xml extension.
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/fla
I was looking for a method like that under the XML class. Flash's help file is
suggesting to use XML instead of XMLDocument which is AS2's xml legacy.
But there doesn't seem to be anything like that method under the XML class...
BLITZ | Patrick Matte - 310-551-0200 x214
-Original Message--
No that didn't work, I got a weird error like wrong startendtag or something.
BLITZ | Patrick Matte - 310-551-0200 x214
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steven Sacks
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 3:36 PM
To: Flash Coders List
Subject: Re:
Well, if you just use quotes properly, that is ;)
'';
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:45 PM, Wagner Amaral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can set the xmlDecl property:
>
> AS3:
> XMLDocument().xmlDecl = "";
>
> AS2:
> XML().xmlDecl = "";
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Patrick Matte | BLIT
You can set the xmlDecl property:
AS3:
XMLDocument().xmlDecl = "";
AS2:
XML().xmlDecl = "";
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Patrick Matte | BLITZ <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm saving an xml file with AIR, it works but how can I add version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> at the top of the file?
Can't you inject that into your xml string?
myXml = "" + myXml;
Patrick Matte | BLITZ wrote:
I'm saving an xml file with AIR, it works but how can I add at the top of the file?
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://c
I'm saving an xml file with AIR, it works but how can I add at the top of the file?
___
Flashcoders mailing list
Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com
http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders
A native English speaker, when learning German, will generally remark
"Wow! Because of this feature in German, I now understand English a
little better."
Programming languages are the same way. Learning another
object-oriented language will help you identify how features in
ActionScript work (or d
ah yeah!! How could I forget something like this :D I've been using
listeners for similar tasks in this application. Woah. Keeping coding for
more than 14 hours daily really comsumes the brain !!!
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Muzak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have the panel with the butt
>granted that the eventListener was added with a weak reference
This seems to be one of the biggest mis-understandings these days. The
listener does *not*add a reference to the object that you are
listening too. For extensive discussion and proof of this issue you
can read the following thread:
If the display object is checking itself, all you have to do is check to
see if stage == null.
Otherwise, you can see if its parent contains it.
parentClip.contains(dispObj);
that said, i'd still like to know how to determine if a display object
is in the current display list?
__
You are using contains() and it is just for that purpose.
Kenneth Kawamoto
http://www.materiaprima.co.uk/
Allandt Bik-Elliott (Receptacle) wrote:
that said, i'd still like to know how to determine if a display object
is in the current display list?
thanks
a
On 2 Apr 2008, at 16:35, Kenneth
displayObjectContainer.contains(child)
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Allandt Bik-Elliott (Receptacle) <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> that said, i'd still like to know how to determine if a display object is
> in the current display list?
>
> thanks
> a
>
>
> On 2 Apr 2008, at 16:35, Kenneth Kawa
From the help files and modified a bit. It is probably more efficient
to keep track of names and the do a getChildByName(string)
function traceDisplayList(container:DisplayObjectContainer,
DispObjToCheck:DisplayObject) : Boolean
{
var child:DisplayObject;
for (var i:uint=0; i < conta
that said, i'd still like to know how to determine if a display
object is in the current display list?
thanks
a
On 2 Apr 2008, at 16:35, Kenneth Kawamoto wrote:
Place outside of the function -> private var eventList:Sprite;
Kenneth Kawamoto
http://www.materiaprima.co.uk/
Allandt Bik-Ellio
that's actually helped me implement a movieActive variable so i've
decided to go down that route instead - thanks for the input
On 2 Apr 2008, at 16:35, Kenneth Kawamoto wrote:
Place outside of the function -> private var eventList:Sprite;
Kenneth Kawamoto
http://www.materiaprima.co.uk/
All
this is how the eventListener is added:
this.basicNews.addEventListener(RepeaterEvent.CLICK,
this.onNewsClicked, false, 0, true);
granted that the eventListener was added with a weak reference
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:35 PM, EECOLOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
*if (this.basicNews != null)
Place outside of the function -> private var eventList:Sprite;
Kenneth Kawamoto
http://www.materiaprima.co.uk/
Allandt Bik-Elliott (Receptacle) wrote:
hmmm - i'm a little stuck on this
i'm trying to create a pop-up (will tween but i want to get it working
first) but i want it to kill any prev
hmmm - i'm a little stuck on this
i'm trying to create a pop-up (will tween but i want to get it
working first) but i want it to kill any previous one that's up - how
would i go about this please?
here's my current code:
CODE
private function createEventList(pbList_xl:XMLLis
granted that the eventListener was added with a weak reference
On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:35 PM, EECOLOR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> *if (this.basicNews != null) {
>this.basicNews.removeEventListener(RepeaterEvent.CLICK,
> this.onNewsClicked);
> this.removeChild(this.basicNews);
> this.bas
*if (this.basicNews != null) {
this.basicNews.removeEventListener(RepeaterEvent.CLICK,
this.onNewsClicked);
this.removeChild(this.basicNews);
this.basicNews.die();
this.basicNews = null;
}*
In the above code I do not see why you would need any more then the
following lines:
*basicNews
So in general, where you in AS2 were using e.target you should now use
e.currentTarget.
+1 ;-)
Must read: Event propagation
http://livedocs.adobe.com/flex/3/html/events_08.html
regards,
Muzak
- Original Message -
From: "EECOLOR" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Flash Coders List"
Sent: Wed
This behaviour can not emulated precisely because there is no way for us to
set the target and currentTarget properties. This is done by internal
EventDispatcher code.
The EventDispatcher code works something like this:
- check if the target property of the event has been set, if not set it
- set
> which is mouseChildren = false.
In my humble opinion I do not think this is what he needs. He should not be
referencing target, but instead he should reference currentTarget.
If you are adding a listener, the handlers e.currentTarget will point to the
object that you added the listener to, e.ta
You may have to wait until your MovieClip is initialised / on the stage
before you do things with child clips.
http://www.senocular.com/pub/kirupa/as3tips_p6.html
There is a tip in there about the DocumentClass and listening for the
ADDED event. There is also an ADDED_TO_STAGE event for later
have you tried without the line public var mc_one:MovieClip;?
it's my understanding that instantiating it by physically dragging it
out of the library and giving it an instance name is the declaration
- the way you're doing it would give a local variable the name with
no value, hence mc_one
Hi tried this but didn't work! here is my code in its most simple form...
package {
import flash.display.MovieClip;
public class mainClass extends MovieClip
{
// Instantiate our classes
public var banner:imageLib = new imageLib();
public function mainClass()
{
banner.loadImage
Hi,
Try tracing in the "onLoad" function:
public class mainClass {
public var mc_one:MovieClip;
public function mainClass()
{
trace(mc_one); // Outputs "null"
}
private function onLoad():void {
trace(mc_one);
}
}
Glen
Stuart (FunkDaWeb
Why don't you set your MainClass as document class?
Kenneth Kawamoto
http://www.materiaprima.co.uk/
Stuart (FunkDaWeb) wrote:
Hello,
I'm having some trouble with AS3, basically if I create a movieclip using the Flash IDE
and give it an instance name of "mc_one", I'm unsure how to access it fr
To me, having 50 Flash Player instances running concurrently does not
sound like the best solution. Can it be just one SWF with 50 display
objects instead?
Kenneth Kawamoto
http://www.materiaprima.co.uk/
Flap Flap wrote:
2008/4/1, Bob Wohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Are you saying that you are loa
Hello,
I'm having some trouble with AS3, basically if I create a movieclip using the
Flash IDE and give it an instance name of "mc_one", I'm unsure how to access it
from an external actionscript class.
Currently on the root timeline I have...
var _mainClass:mainClass = new mainClass();
Which
Is this happening on Firefox???
Have you tried running on a couple of other browsers to compare?
Have you tried showing 25 SWF's to see if memory usage is approx half?
Flap Flap wrote:
2008/4/1, Bob Wohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Are you saying that you are loading 50 images into 1 swf?
OR 50
so how does it work internally for displayObjects? Can a developer emulate
this behaviours somehow?(cant imagine it since target and currentTarget are
readonly)
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Merrill, Jason <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, you still haven't convinced me it isn't kludy, but n
It's hard to guess at this without seeing the code.
Typically, this happens when you're trying to instantiate something that
isn't a class or is a circular or conflicting reference. Something like
var myJunk:NotAClass = new NotAClass();
or
var mc:MovieClip = new MovieClip();
mc = new IsAClass(
2008/4/1, Bob Wohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Are you saying that you are loading 50 images into 1 swf?
>
> OR 50 images into 50 swfs and loading those into 1 swf?
>
> OR 50 swfs embeded into a browser?
We have the same swf embed 50 time in a php page
Each of them load a different image.
Thanks
Thank you for the reply. I will take a look at the state Pattern.
Reading your post, I does look a bit like what I proposed. In the state
pattern, I would probably create the layout and the types of buttonsets
for the panel create in a object. The state of the panel then determines
wich state t
39 matches
Mail list logo
