RE: [Flashcoders] self published.

2006-06-01 Thread Bernard Visscher
socket server? http://www.osflash.org/red5 ? ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive: http://chattyfig.figleaf.com/mailman/listinfo/flashcoders Brought to you by Fig Leaf Software Premier

Re: [Flashcoders] self published.

2006-06-01 Thread Mike Britton
Red5 requires a jvm (or jre) on the server, if I read correctly. I've been trying to get my host to install one for shared hosting accounts, and would use this red5 over localconnection if I were lucky enough to have java. Mike ___

RE: [Flashcoders] self published.

2006-06-01 Thread Bernard Visscher
: Re: [Flashcoders] self published. Red5 requires a jvm (or jre) on the server, if I read correctly. I've been trying to get my host to install one for shared hosting accounts, and would use this red5 over localconnection if I were lucky enough to have java. Mike

Re: [Flashcoders] self published.

2006-06-01 Thread Thomas Marbois
Ah! Very nice! Thank you! Tj On Jun 1, 2006, at 6:36 AM, Bernard Visscher wrote: socket server? http://www.osflash.org/red5 ? ___ Flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com To change your subscription options or search the archive:

Re: [Flashcoders] self published.

2006-06-01 Thread Thomas Marbois
: donderdag 1 juni 2006 15:46 Aan: Flashcoders mailing list Onderwerp: Re: [Flashcoders] self published. Red5 requires a jvm (or jre) on the server, if I read correctly. I've been trying to get my host to install one for shared hosting accounts, and would use this red5 over localconnection if I were

[Flashcoders] self published.

2006-05-30 Thread Thomas Marbois
Hi I have an idea for a self placed utility using Flash. Meaning I allow users to place this utility in their own domains - and I dont know where those domains are -- and my utility allows me real-time communications between their published file - and my servers. What kind of Flash

RE: [Flashcoders] self published.

2006-05-30 Thread Matthew Simpson
utility and make it available via the exchange as a component instead? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Thomas Marbois Sent: Tue 5/30/2006 7:40 PM To: flashcoders@chattyfig.figleaf.com Subject: [Flashcoders] self published. Hi I have an idea for a self

Re: [Flashcoders] self published.

2006-05-30 Thread Mike Britton
Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but it would be possible to make a connection between servers using LocalConnection. You'd have to ensure your client swf was assigned an id to authenticate their application to access the data. There would have to be a security model, in other words.

Re: [Flashcoders] self published.

2006-05-30 Thread Rich Rodecker
ah, i think i am going to have to correct you mike. a LocalConnection is for allowint two swf's running in two separate windows on the same machine to talk to each other. On 5/30/06, Mike Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone please correct me if I'm wrong, but it would be possible to make

Re: [Flashcoders] self published.

2006-05-30 Thread Michael Bedar
socket server? On May 30, 2006, at 7:40 PM, Thomas Marbois wrote: Hi I have an idea for a self placed utility using Flash. Meaning I allow users to place this utility in their own domains - and I dont know where those domains are -- and my utility allows me real-time communications

RE: [Flashcoders] self published.

2006-05-30 Thread Tom Lee
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rich Rodecker Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 9:03 PM To: Flashcoders mailing list Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] self published. ah, i think i am going to have to correct you mike. a LocalConnection is for allowint two swf's running in two separate windows on the same machine to talk