RE: [Flashcoders] Player Version Penetration -- Comparison Stats

2006-02-01 Thread David Mendels
that we saw with the previous version! -David > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of hank williams > Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 10:57 AM > To: Flashcoders mailing list > Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Playe

Re: [Flashcoders] Player Version Penetration -- Comparison Stats

2006-02-01 Thread JesterXL
They only need 6.0.65.0 for that. - Original Message - From: "Johannes Nel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Flashcoders mailing list" Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 10:58 AM Subject: Re: [Flashcoders] Player Version Penetration -- Comparison Stats auto update b

Re: [Flashcoders] Player Version Penetration -- Comparison Stats

2006-02-01 Thread Johannes Nel
auto update built in prompting the user to upgrade On 2/1/06, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does anyone know exactly what differences there are between 7 and 8 > that might make 8.5 adoption faster than 8 adoption? My recollection > is that there is some improvement in 8 in this reg

Re: [Flashcoders] Player Version Penetration -- Comparison Stats

2006-02-01 Thread hank williams
Does anyone know exactly what differences there are between 7 and 8 that might make 8.5 adoption faster than 8 adoption? My recollection is that there is some improvement in 8 in this regard, but I am not sure. Regards Hank On 2/1/06, Mark Winterhalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: [Flashcoders] Player Version Penetration -- Comparison Stats

2006-02-01 Thread Mark Winterhalder
hth, mark On 2/1/06, Clive Sweeney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The recently published stats of "Flash Player Version Penetration" -- > http://www.macromedia.com/soft