Re: [flexcoders] Re: Refactoring with Flex Builder 3

I recommend using the FlexBuilder plug-in version for an existing Eclipse IDE installation. Fer.- On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 06 Mar 2008, m88e24 wrote: > > refactoring support available in the Java Eclipse environment, this so > > called

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Closing Project

ike uploading a screenshot). I hope they consider this as highly important, since many people close their projects on FlexBuilder to improve performance of their IDEs; which is probably your case. Fer.- On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Amy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In flexcoders@y

Re: [flexcoders] Closing Project

Hello Amy, In Eclipse IDE that's the default behavior. So, if you're using the FlexBuilder Plug-in you shouldn't have that problem. I don't know about the standalone version of FlexBuilder, but since its built on Eclipse... there should be no difference. Fer.- On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Amy

Re: [flexcoders] Web services: Patterns for recoverable errors like business rule violations?

I agree with Josh, partially. The most important feature in MVC is the loose coupling of layers. Make the View dependent from the underlying domain model, but not vice-versa. You should always be able to build a different client for your domain model without compromising its security nor its integr

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Praise for the Flex 3 Documentation

There's a book published by torrent on Flex3 that actually rocks. Of course, downloading of copyright protected material is your own responsability. Fer.- On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Paul Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "comfederation" <[EMAIL PROT