you wanted
something to happen, the WHOLE PAGE had to load again! :^)
From:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dowdell
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006
3:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flash
Player 9 Projected Adoption
om [mailto:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John Dowdell
Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006
3:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flash
Player 9 Projected Adoption rate
Evan
Gifford wrote:
What's curious to me is that flash player 8 was
not markedly faster
, June 14, 2006
3:01 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Flash
Player 9 Projected Adoption rate
Evan
Gifford wrote:
What's curious to me is that flash player 8 was
not markedly faster due to new in-context upgrade (which I
have had
some trouble with).
http
I found this interesting graph from Manish Jethani which shows flash
player adoption rates. What's curious to me is that flash player 8 was
not markedly faster due to new in-context upgrade (which I have had
some trouble with).
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mannu/148867953/
Does anyone have a
Evan Gifford wrote:
What's curious to me is that flash player 8 was
not markedly faster due to new in-context upgrade (which I have had
some trouble with).
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mannu/148867953/
It may be hard to see on that graph, but I do know that the Flash Player
8 adoption rate
5 matches
Mail list logo
