I have to commend you all for posting a lot of wonderful components
and extensions to Flex... eg. Ely's calendar, Doug and Jason's tab
navigator extensions, Ben and Trey's reflection effect, Alex's
distortion effect, just to name a few.
Unfortunately, in these day and age, I would have to ask..
That's an awesome topic and I'd love to hear more about it.
My current understanding is that any published work comes under copyright
protection, and that would necessitate permission from the author before
incorporation into a commercial work, if there is no explicit licensing info
provided.
-S
If no license is specified, then I would assume they are in the
public domain and are available for free use.
At 03:31 PM 2/6/2007, you wrote:
I have to commend you all for posting a lot of wonderful components
and extensions to Flex... eg. Ely's calendar, Doug and Jason's tab
navigator ext
I didn't think of that. It is completely contradictory to what I
said, but you might be right. I suppose it depends what is going on.
At 03:52 PM 2/6/2007, you wrote:
That's an awesome topic and I'd love to hear more about it.
My current understanding is that any published work comes und
For Ely's calendar, all files contain the following disclaimer:
/*Copyright (c) 2006 Adobe Systems Incorporated
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person
obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation
files (the "Software"), to deal in the Software without
restr
I'd be interested in what a more legal understanding is, but for
anything that I post that includes source code, it's my understanding
that you can go and do whatever you want with it. Include it in other
products, yadda yadda. Basically if I don't include licensing terms I'm
giving you whateve
If no license is specified, then I would assume they are in the public
domain and are available for free use.
I would suspect that's a dangerous assumption. I realize that if you're
posting code on a blog, than you can expect someone to probably copy it, but
in a court, I understand that any o
ble to the community.
Jason
-Message d'origine-
De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la
part de Doug McCune
Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2007 22:33
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Intellectual property or licensing of
posted/blogged
Valid points. I'm unclear on the differences between copyright
and licensing when applied to software distributed at no cost over
the Internet.
It makes sense that the original publisher could claim copyright on
the code. Many blogs have a standard disclaimer in regards to content.
Man
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
la part de* Doug McCune
*Envoyé :* mardi 6 février 2007 22:33
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* Re: [flexcoders] Intellectual property or licensing of
posted/blogged work
I'd be interested in what a more legal understanding is, but for anything
that I post tha
e
Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2007 21:31
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : [flexcoders] Intellectual property or licensing of posted/blogged
work
I have to commend you all for posting a lot of wonderful components
and extensions to Flex... eg. Ely's calendar, Doug and Jason&#x
engkee
*Envoyé :* mardi 6 février 2007 21:31
*À :* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
*Objet :* [flexcoders] Intellectual property or licensing of
posted/blogged work
I have to commend you all for posting a lot of wonderful components
and extensions to Flex... eg. Ely's calendar, Doug and Jason'
jason
-Message d'origine-
De : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la
part de Daniel Freiman
Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2007 23:51
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet : Re: [flexcoders] Intellectual property or licensing of
posted/blogged work
As for copyrights vs
I will now pass myself off as a legal expert despite the fact that I haven't
attended law school...so anyone with authority should overrule my opinion.
Generally speaking, if the owner (which is usually the author) publishes the
code on the web, then you are allowed to look at it. They showed it
ce.
Jason-Message d'origine-
De :
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part
de engkee
Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2007
21:31
À : flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Objet :
[flexcoders] Intellectual property or licensing of posted/blogged
work
I have to commend
xcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Intellectual property or licensing of
posted/blogged work
I didn't think of that. It is completely contradictory to what I said,
but you might be right. I suppose it depends what is going on.
At 03:52 PM 2/6/2007, you wrote:
That
il asking about
it.
Ely.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Daniel Freiman
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 1:08 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Intellectual property or licensing of
posted/blogged work
I will
17 matches
Mail list logo
