Re: [flexcoders] Re: Bug In Tree openItems setter?

2006-12-12 Thread hank williams
Yeah, I figured out something similar to that to close everything and then I apply the new openItems, so I have been able to move forward, but it does seem to me that they should fix the code (preferable) or fix the documentation of the way openItems works. Regards, Hank On 12/12/06, bhaq1972 <[E

[flexcoders] Re: Bug In Tree openItems setter?

2006-12-12 Thread bhaq1972
have you tried something like myTree.expandItem(myTree.openItems[1], false); --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "hank williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > lol. I am really retarded today. I redundantly restated what I said in > the subject, and then I spelled it wrong. > > On 12/11/06, ha

[flexcoders] Re: Bug In Tree openItems setter?

2006-12-11 Thread hank williams
lol. I am really retarded today. I redundantly restated what I said in the subject, and then I spelled it wrong. On 12/11/06, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh, by the way, this relates to the openItems property of the Treee class. > > Hank > > On 12/11/06, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTEC

[flexcoders] Re: Bug In Tree openItems setter?

2006-12-11 Thread hank williams
Oh, by the way, this relates to the openItems property of the Treee class. Hank On 12/11/06, hank williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The documentation for the openItems field says that it is read/write > and that the default is NULL, which presumably means no items are > open. But it appears t