ouch, I cried for 10 minutes! ha! Its all good. Tim's suggestion about .errorString agrees with me.DKOn 9/9/06, bjorn.schultheiss <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Sorry, bad morning.I do have manners, i just didn't show them very well then.
Regards,Bjorn Schultheiss--Flexcoders Mailing ListFAQ: htt
No worries man. Been there. Ralf, I think sometimes it's easy to get
too model happy. Centralizing validators, either in the model or a
utility class, promotes encapsulation and reuse. But, the more you
put in the model, the more complicated the model gets. For less than
enterprise applica
Sorry, bad morning.
I do have manners, i just didn't show them very well then.
Regards,
Bjorn Schultheiss
--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
Search Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com
Yahoo! Groups
tay
> > in the
> > > > model.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for all of your contributions. Can I also take the
> > opportunity to
> > > > say that this is the most welcoming and active group that I
> have
> > > > participated in... Ke
t; > >
> > > Graham
> > >
> > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Bjorn Schultheiss"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Gladly,
> > > >
> > > > simple example.
> > > >
> > > > // view
t; > >
> > > Graham
> > >
> > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Bjorn Schultheiss"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Gladly,
> > > >
> > > > simple example.
> > > >
> > > &g
atch a data invalid event
that
> > the
> > > view acts upon or a checkValid function that returns the data
required
> > to
> > > act?
> > >
> > > I know this is very much academic, particularly as since posting
> > originally,
> > > I h
___ > > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On> Behalf Of grahampengelly> Sent: Friday, 8 September 2006 12:24 PM> To:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm... Where should this go?> > > > Thanks all for the
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On> Behalf Of grahampengelly> Sent: Friday, 8 September 2006 12:24 PM> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm... Where should this go?> > > > Thanks all for the discussion...> > So it s
oders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
grahampengellySent: Friday, 8 September 2006 12:24
PMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Re:
Cairngorm... Where should this go?
Thanks all for the discussion...So it seems the consensus is the
validation, from a pattern purist poi
; Sent: Friday, 8 September 2006 6:28 AM> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm... Where should this go?> > > > Sorry but I have to interject on this. Intsrestingly enough I asked a> similar question some days ago and did not receive a response from a>
6:28
AMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Re:
Cairngorm... Where should this go?
Sorry but I have to interject on this. Intsrestingly enough I asked
asimilar question some days ago and did not receive a response from
adesign pettern perspective, but from a "what works&qu
om: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
lostinrecursion
Sent: 07 September 2006 10:28 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm... Where should this go?
Sorry but I have to interject on this. Intsrestingly enough I asked a similar
question some
Sorry but I have to interject on this. Intsrestingly enough I asked a
similar question some days ago and did not receive a response from a
design pettern perspective, but from a "what works" perspective. I am
actually 85% of the tim all about what works, so not there is anything
wrong with it. But,
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dimitrios Gianninas
Sent: 07 September 2006 15:29
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re:
Cairngorm... Where should this go?
I always do
"what simply works".
Sometimes I do
something, and days/weeks/months
nninas
RIA
Developer
Optimal
Payments Inc.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
grahampengellySent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 9:39
AMTo: flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: [flexcoders] Re:
Cairngorm... Where should this go?
Thanks for your suggestion Dimitri
Thanks for your suggestion Dimitrios...
I had thought of that too but in the MVC architecture, doesn't that
put logic into the view? My impression of the architecture is that you
should be able to create a different view over the same model without
duplicating code. I mean, I don't want to have an
17 matches
Mail list logo
