RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cyclical References

2005-03-26 Thread Matt Chotin
extra watchers would then be created.   Matt   From: Joe Berkovitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 7:37 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cyclical References   I am sure that Matt is right about not being able to reliably detect

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cyclical References

2005-03-26 Thread Joe Berkovitz
circularity at all, not binding > failing to > generate some of its code. > > > > I'm hoping that a lot of the work we're doing on the next version > will > address these kinds of issues. > > > > Matt > > > > _ > > From: E

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cyclical References

2005-03-25 Thread Matt Chotin
, March 25, 2005 6:14 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Cyclical References   Apparently it's not so rare...! If you can't fix the problwm, perhaps there's a tool which will make it easier to detect and/or track down these issues? Silently doing the wron

[flexcoders] Re: Cyclical References

2005-03-25 Thread Eric Raymond
Apparently it's not so rare...! If you can't fix the problwm, perhaps there's a tool which will make it easier to detect and/or track down these issues? Silently doing the wrong thing in some cases is not a great position statement for a tools vendor. Of course I would care less about this if t

[flexcoders] Re: Cyclical References (and faulty binding code)

2005-03-25 Thread Eric Raymond
I have that problem as well but didn't want to mention it because it was too hard to explain and I thought it might be a symptom of the compiler error issue. And I also have referneces between .as files and .mxml files. But this is very scary because at runtime you have binding not working but