[flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-24 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The measuring renderer is invisible, but on the display list and is held > onto in case of the need for future measuring. > > > > itemsNeedMeasurement is protected so you can't access it from the > outside. You mig

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-24 Thread Alex Harui
tSize From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amy Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 11:46 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater() --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:fl

[flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-24 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Tracy Spratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Repeater has some level of recycling if you set recycleChildren="true" > (default is false). This has a noticable effect on complex repeated > items. You're completely right that it would have been less time-consumin

[flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-24 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It would be be considerable work to get the measuring renderer to be the > first renderer, because the first renderer changes as you scroll. Interesting. Where does that measuring renderer go, then? > I don't think

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-24 Thread Tracy Spratt
day, April 24, 2008 1:38 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater() It would be be considerable work to get the measuring renderer to be the first renderer, because the first renderer changes as you scroll. I don't think it shou

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-24 Thread Alex Harui
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amy Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 10:31 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater() --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr

[flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-24 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > HorizontalList requires that all items be the same width and height. At > startup, it measures the first one, and uses the measurements for > columnWidth and rowHeight. Is there a way to get it to just use the first i

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-24 Thread Alex Harui
30 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater() --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Amy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:

[flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-24 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Amy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" wrote: > > > > I'm pretty sure you're not lazy, which is why I'm suggesting that > you > > continue to spend time upgrading your skills at debugging. As your > > applications

[flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-23 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm pretty sure you're not lazy, which is why I'm suggesting that you > continue to spend time upgrading your skills at debugging. As your > applications reach a certain level of sophistication, good debugging > skills

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-22 Thread Alex Harui
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amy Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 12:35 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater() --- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com> , "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-22 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Amy, > > > > Many folks have used HBox as a renderer successfully. Maybe there's > something about repeater that is exposing a problem, but all I can do at > this point is try to offer advice on how to get more in

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-22 Thread Alex Harui
lexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amy Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2008 7:52 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater() Hi, Alex; > > The HBox has been pretty thoroughly debugged, but that doesn't mean

[flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-22 Thread Amy
Hi, Alex; > > The HBox has been pretty thoroughly debugged, but that doesn't mean it > will work for you in all possible scenarios. A single call to > validateClient is made then the HBox's measurements are used. Anything > that causes a second validation pass can be missed. > > > > Callin

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-21 Thread Alex Harui
-Alex From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Amy Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 7:46 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater() --- In flexcoders@yahoo

[flexcoders] Re: Tiny components when using callLater()

2008-04-21 Thread Amy
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Harui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The renderer's size is dictated by how its measurements come out. I'd > debug the measure() method and see why it isn't computing correctly. In > theory, setting the dp on dataChange shouldn't matter as it is after >