On Monday 21 August 2006 12:54, Samuel D. Colak wrote:
> Is it thus by implication that FDS become some form of flash "Hibernate" ?
There are people working on that right now :-)
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to confidentially target second-generation systems
m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Samuel D. Colak
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 5:55 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Importance: High
Guys,
flex's interoperability to webservices under Sun/IBM and Mic
Samuel, I am not sure why you're comparing FDS and web services so
closely. They are 2 different technologies meant to do 2 different
things. That is, 2 different ways of getting data to your clients.
As for your statement that web services are fully implemented in Flex,
that is certainly not the
Is it thus by implication that FDS become some form of flash "Hibernate" ?
Because personally id like to know if that were the case. In terms of
data-sync, this is not part of any webservice specification and as for
poll-less server push - well that's just against the whole notion of
webservices i
On Sunday 20 August 2006 16:55, Samuel D. Colak wrote:
> why - Its obvious that actionscript has taken a significant leap in
> development, so why is everyone here talking about a 3rd product (FDS) to
> do what you can really easily achieve under AS.
There are some use cases, where what FDS gives
n how to set this up.
>
> We could start firing issues when encountered, but that's far from a
> structural approach, which is needed for this topic, if you ask me.
>
> Let us know,
> Cheers,
> Franck
>
> -Original Message-
> From: flexcoders@yahoogro
d for this topic, if you ask me.
Let us know,
Cheers,
Franck
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Seth Hodgson
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 8:41 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What'
know if you can regenerate your service based on the updated schema but
it may be worth a try.
Best,
Seth
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Franck
de Bruijn
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 9:49 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subjec
OC/Literal issues arise.
Cheers,
Franck
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Lee
Sent: Friday, August 18, 2006 5:16 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
And my pe
g to
> > look into our problems.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Franck
> >
> >
> >
> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > Of Samuel D. Colak
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:22 AM
> > To: flexcoders
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Franck
> >
> >
> >
> > From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> > Of Samuel D. Colak
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 10:22 AM
> > To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [f
Title: Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Umm – Franck – what issues with webservices?
On 15/8/06 20:00, "Franck de Bruijn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That’s exactly what Ben is hammering at.
It’s too hard to get webservice
Title: Re: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
Hold on VS buggy ?? My god, that’s amazing news – there was I thinking for a moment that M$oft had got it right at least once - ‘fraid to say im most disappointed – my world has surely shattered – frankly I would a
s@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
>
> For your second example, if you wr
oders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
> Does it compile for you without errors?
Yep, this exact code works for me.
http://www.adobe.com/2006/mxml";
layout="absolute" creationComplete="init()">
gt; Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
>
> For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
> inside of a function it should
ogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of ben.clinkinbeard
> Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:42 PM
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
>
> For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than th
@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: WebService - What's wrong with this code?
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I ca
For your second example, if you wrap the lines other than the import
inside of a function it should work.
HTH,
Ben
--- In flexcoders@yahoogroups.com, "Tom Lee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't figure this out for the life of me - I'm following other
people's
> examples, but still getting er
19 matches
Mail list logo
