:29 AM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex 3
Profesional?
>> It sounds very heroic. I'll keep and eye out for further enlightenment.
>
> Is this forum a philosophical debate or a support list for a
> technology? Come on, Paul... "bothere
> It sounds very heroic. I'll keep and eye out for further enlightenment.
Is this forum a philosophical debate or a support list for a
technology? Come on, Paul... "bothered" by Scott's presence? Come on,
we're writing webapps, not planning federal monetary policy or
surgical regimens. There are n
It sounds very heroic. I'll keep and eye out for further enlightenment.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Scott Barnes
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 8:01 AM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex 3
Profes
en the actual parties get involved that I get
> nervous.
>
> I think I've made my point, as have you and others. I'm going to let things
> be. Just don't offer any discounts here for Silverlight for Flex
> developers.. ;-)
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> - O
Flex developers.. ;-)
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Scott Barnes
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 6:04 AM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex 3
Profesional?
wow :)
I only joined Microsoft in 2007 (prio
gt; - Original Message -----
> *From:* Paul Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 01, 2008 12:23 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex
> 3 Profesional?
>
> No. I just think that whe
Andrews
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 12:23 AM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex 3
Profesional?
No. I just think that when it's the head of a rival technology company
technology, it's different. Clearly, it&#
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Jeffry Houser
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex 3
Profesional?
One of my friends, a long time ColdFusion Developer has been doing a
One of my friends, a long time ColdFusion Developer has been doing a
lot of work with Ruby lately. Are you saying it's wrong for him to talk
to me about Ruby?
I'm not grokking the basis of your argument.
Paul Andrews wrote:
I guess I'm the agressive one. I've seen other products where f
> Overreacting maybe, but not silly. Microsoft has many years of playing
> nicely ahead of them before they get benefit of the doubt.
We don't have to give MS the benefit of the doubt... just Scott. And
over the last year or so, I've not seen anything from Scott that would
suggest we should give h
nager for a competing
product, well I'm not so happy. I've seen it done before.
Paul
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 1:20 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex
illy...
>
>
> *From:* Paul Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *Sent:* Saturday, May 31, 2008 7:06 AM
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex
> 3 Profesional?
>
> Microsoft could always avoid mistakes by lice
s and viewpoints? Damn, that's down right
silly...
From: Paul Andrews
Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2008 7:06 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex 3
Profesional?
Microsoft could always avoid mistakes by licencing Flash
osoft forum (shudder), I'd feel
equally peeved if Adobe bods were sticking their nose in there)
- Original Message -
From: Scott Barnes
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 8:18 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and F
e
> days.. ;-)
>
> Have a good weekend.
>
> Paul
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Troy Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
> To: >
> Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 4:36 PM
> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex 3
>
, 2008 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial Flex 3 and Flex 3
Profesional?
>> Just for a moment I thought this was the flex coders forum rather than an
>> extension of the MS marketing effort..
>
> Okay, be nice, it's on-topic... the thread had lead to a qu
> Just for a moment I thought this was the flex coders forum rather than an
> extension of the MS marketing effort..
Okay, be nice, it's on-topic... the thread had lead to a question of
whether it was possible to develop in Silverlight for free (in the
same way its possible to develop in Flex for
Just for a moment I thought this was the flex coders forum rather than an
extension of the MS marketing effort..
- Original Message -
From: Scott Barnes
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 4:29 AM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] The different between generial
On Friday 30 May 2008, Scott Barnes wrote:
> FYI: If you wanted to build Silverlight with nothing but Notepad, here's
> how:
> http://weblogs.asp.net/mschwarz/archive/2007/06/05/how-to-create-silverligh
>t-applications-with-notepad.aspx
I was hoping for nothing but vi, but there's still no sign of
No offence taken.
FYI: If you wanted to build Silverlight with nothing but Notepad, here's
how:
http://weblogs.asp.net/mschwarz/archive/2007/06/05/how-to-create-silverlight-applications-with-notepad.aspx
Also keep in mind should .NET not be your cup of tea, we've also shipped
Silverlight to inclu
On Thursday 29 May 2008, Scott Barnes wrote:
> Expression Studio is not required to write Silverlight (It's obviously
> recommended though). That being said it's kind of like saying Flex Builder
> is/isn't required to write Flex? :)
No offence to Scott, but I just don't trust Microsoft the same w
Expression Studio is not required to write Silverlight (It's obviously
recommended though). That being said it's kind of like saying Flex Builder
is/isn't required to write Flex? :)
-
Scott Barnes
Product Manager
Microsoft.
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Troy Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I believe it has a 'non compete' clause, but we're not looking to use a single
> platform solution regardless of cost.
It may, it may not. Doesn't really matter, though. If you made a
product that competes with an MS product then realistically you can
afford to pay $150 to purchase a commercial
On Tuesday 27 May 2008, Troy Gilbert wrote:
> you're talking about)? The .NET SDK is free to use without VS.NET, and
I believe it has a 'non compete' clause, but we're not looking to use a single
platform solution regardless of cost.
> the runtime is freely available. Hell, MS even provides a fr
24 matches
Mail list logo
