Hi Jeff,
> I could not follow the code.txt
> link in your post
I wonder why that wouldn't work for you. Let's try again. I've posted
the file again with a different name:
http://www.brightworks.com/technology/tech_questions/hibernate_lazy_associations/code_2.txt
Can you see this one?
> I s
Hi Douglas,
(snip)
3. Jeff said that I should set the association properties for my
filmActors destination as one-to-one. I'm guessing that this should be
many-to-one, but am not sure. I've tried both it doesn't help my current
problem, but I'd love a definitive answer on which this s
PS. Be careful. I just checked the links in this post and the code page
was retrieved from my cache. The new version does *not* have and error
message at the top. Hit refresh if it does. :-)
Douglas
Douglas McCarroll wrote:
> Douglas McCarroll wrote:
>
>> Thanks. I'll let you know how it g
Douglas McCarroll wrote:
> Thanks. I'll let you know how it goes.
Still stuck. :-)
Same "Page request made for item with id = '{filmId=null}'" error.
I believe that I've implemented Jeff's suggestions.
I've refreshed this code listing so that it reflects my current code:
http://www.brightwo
Thanks. I'll let you know how it goes.
Jeff Vroom wrote:
>
> Ø Do I need a fourth destination for the FilmActorID class?
>
> Nope, that instance is managed by the FilmActor destination. It does
> not have its own “id” so it can’t be in a separate destination.
>
> Jeff
>
>
--
Flexcoders Mail
* Do I need a fourth destination for the FilmActorID class?
Nope, that instance is managed by the FilmActor destination. It does
not have its own "id" so it can't be in a separate destination.
Jeff
nk hibernate requires that all id
columns are stored in the same property in Java. I am not sure about
that...
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Douglas McCarroll
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 6:00 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.co
do a query for each actor
> to retrieve the filmActors properties. It will be a little faster than
> today because it won’t need to join in the Film table because of the
> intermediate mapping object.
>
> Jeff
>
>
Original Message-
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> Beha
messed up because of that? It might be worth
> changing that to an int if that is an easy test to run.
>
> I will try to get a chance to look at this more tomorrow.
>
> Jeff
>
> -Original Message-
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
>
Jeff
>
> -Original Message-
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>
> [mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:flexcoders%40yahoogroups.com>] On
> Behalf Of Douglas McCarroll
> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:26 AM
> To
test to run.
I will try to get a chance to look at this more tomorrow.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Douglas McCarroll
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 11:26 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] many-
Jeff Vroom wrote:
> 4) If you turn on debug logging in the server for
> the “Endpoint.*” logging category, you’ll see the
> object graph which is sent to the client after
> your fill. I am curious if the time is being
> spent loading the data from the database or
> sending data to the client
nce to look into the test case in more detail
> later. Regards,
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> *On Behalf Of *Douglas McCarroll
> *Sent:* Tuesday, Novem
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Douglas McCarroll
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 3:19 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] many-to-many managed association in Hibernate
destination
Hi Richard
Hi Richard,
> I was under the impression that you have to use DTOs, rather
> than mapping your client classes to your domain objects.
I Google "flex hibernate lazy" and I find this:
http://livedocs.macromedia.com/flex/2/docs/wwhelp/wwhimpl/common/html/wwhelp.htm?context=LiveDocs_Parts&file=000
I'm not currently using Flex, but I don't believe it's possible to map
ActionScript classes to lazily-loaded Hibernate classes because of all the
hibernate proxy stuff. I was under the impression that you have to use DTOs,
rather than mapping your client classes to your domain objects. Am I wrong?
Hi All,
This is essentially a repost of my "How to implement Lazy Hibernate?"
question.
I'm still completely stuck. Here's the error message I'm getting:
[RPC Fault faultString="Page request made for item with id =
'{filmId=null}'. The item was not in the cache and the adapter's get
method f
18 matches
Mail list logo