Re: [flexcoders] passing values to FilterFunctions?

Hi, I find sometimes just subclassing ArrayCollection works. This way your are defining certain types of collections that do different things. You can then add functionality to the class with methods or whatever. This works well for me. Then I define the different filter functions based on that

Re: [flexcoders] passing values to FilterFunctions?

I simply assign the input values to some properties of the filter whenever they change. Cheers, Ralf. On 5/24/07, Kevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: using this approach the filter functions still need to reference the view to get optional filter parameters correct. For example, if you want to

Re: [flexcoders] passing values to FilterFunctions?

using this approach the filter functions still need to reference the view to get optional filter parameters correct. For example, if you want to filter based on a user inputed text field you can just do this: collection.filterFunction = filter.filterFunction (textFld.text); since the filt

Re: [flexcoders] passing values to FilterFunctions?

I'm using a FilterClass, which holds just the filterFunction and some optional ways to configure the filtering. Every collection, which needs filtering, gets an instance of this FilterClass by assigning collection.filterFunction = filter.filterFunction; Cheers, Ralf. On 5/24/07, Kevin <[EMAIL P

[flexcoders] passing values to FilterFunctions?

I would like to attempt to separate my filter functions from my view so that I am not duplicating code when two views share similar filter functions. My idea was to create a class that contains a ListCollection and all the appropriate FilterFunctions for that collection. The FilterFunctio