RE: [flexcoders] why shouldnt I use flex 2?

2006-12-14 Thread Dimitrios Gianninas
s Inc. From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of greg h Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:25 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] why shouldnt I use flex 2? gadi, What is your audience and when will you be deploying? I ask because Flex 2 h

Re: [flexcoders] why shouldnt I use flex 2?

2006-12-14 Thread Gadi Srebnik
thank you all for the detailed answer :) gadi On 12/13/06, greg h <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: gadi, What is your audience and when will you be deploying? I ask because Flex 2 has no capability to publish to Flash Player (FP) versions earlier than FP9. As of the latest FP penetration stats

Re: [flexcoders] why shouldnt I use flex 2?

2006-12-13 Thread greg h
gadi, What is your audience and when will you be deploying? I ask because Flex 2 has no capability to publish to Flash Player (FP) versions earlier than FP9. As of the latest FP penetration stats (Sept '06), FP9 is only at around 36% (of the known universe). See following link for FP product m

Re: [flexcoders] why shouldnt I use flex 2?

2006-12-13 Thread Webdevotion
pro: You can integrate the flv player component(s) in your app It handles web services very nicely ( amf, very small filesize ) It can do anything you can do with Actionscript 3 > It's blazing fast ! including connection to FMS It's very well documented Nice frameworks > google for "Cairngorm"

[flexcoders] why shouldnt I use flex 2?

2006-12-13 Thread gadi_sr
Hi all, my first question here :) I know this is a tricky question in place like this, but in order to find the perfect solution to my product, I need to know the downsomes in using Flex 2 in its current state. The nature of the product involves FMS communication, web services (not FDS) and fl