Hi guys,
As I'm sure you're aware, the product team are gearing up for Flex 2
release. As the product goes through it's final revs towards release,
we're focussing our time on ensuring that the next release of Cairngorm
and the samples are aligned with the final product release.
There will be
[mailto:flexcoders@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steven Webster
Sent: Tuesday, 6 June 2006 7:41 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re:
Cairngorm question
Hi guys,
As I'm sure you're aware, the product team are gearing up for Flex 2
release. As the product goes th
:
flexcoders@yahoogroups.comSubject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm
question
Steven,As a
request.
I am very interested
in your team’s ideas of the cairngorm framework that fully utilizes Flex Data
Services.
I assume the Flex2
release isn’t far away and I hope an
Nathan & Claudieu,
Thanks for the response. After I posted my question I started reading
and thinking how to correct this and came up with the same idea Nathan
suggested. I started refactoring everything and so far it is going
great.
On Apr 10, 2009, at 3:46 AM, "nathanpdaniel"
wrote:
Hi YJ,
Sure - the Cairngorm code is unmodified. For instance, in your view
you might have:
private var viewHelper : OurViewHelper;
private var searchDefinition : SearchDefinitionVO;
...
EventBroadcaster.getInstance().broadcastEvent
(OurController.SEARCH_COMMAND,
{viewHelper:viewHelpe
For large applications I believe you have to do a
bit of refactoring and start playing with RSLs.
Aside of the obvious reasons of performance gain
during development by eliminating unnecessary recompilation it kind of force you
to eliminate weak links and create "layered" components - based
Dave Wolf wrote:
> We are firm believers of precompiling our applications when in
> production rather then using the JIT MXML compiler. We are big
> proponents of ANT and automate the builds of not only the MXML but of
> the entire production server. With one command line we build the
> entire si
Dave Wolf wrote:
> I was just shown your weblog today about this and they are awesome.
> The crazy part is they look a ton like ours. Guess you have a couple
> of smart people and they reach the same conclusions! Really great
> posting Darron. We have tons of macros for everything from compilin
Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Darron J. Schall
Sent: 24 January 2006 00:45
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question
Dave Wolf wrote:
> I was just shown your weblog today about this and they are awesome.
: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Leon Tanner
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:46 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question
Ok, we've gone down the route of using mxmlc.jar for precompilation.
The reason is purely to include
it?
>
> Thanks
> L
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
> Behalf Of Darron J. Schall
> Sent: 24 January 2006 00:45
> To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cair
flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter Watson
Sent: 24 January 2006 18:32
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm Question
Hi Leon,
This mxmlc option will enable setting the amfgateway url @ runtime:
-remoteallowurloverride
It will al
Thank you Daniel, if no more suggestions/corrections are done, I will
take that choice.
Of course a recovery plan was planed plus de mute option is also welcome. :)
Daniel Harfleet escribió:
>Alberto,
>
>this seems a fair approach to me, you may also want to include some
>logic to disconnect f
Hi Alberto,
in addition to what Dan said, you could create an object similar to Business
Delegates used for request/response remote calls - in applications that we have
developed, we call these "Listeners".
These listeners provide control and protection for your server push remote
services.
Hi Alex,
I like the idea of "Listeners" and they way you point to manage server
pushes injecting events and data to the Cairngorm architecture. Mainly
because server pushes are treat just like if they were data from a
user-gesture.
If possible, send me a sample code for one of these "Listeners
helps,
Alex
--
Alex Uhlmann
Software Engineer
iteration::two
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alberto
Albericio Salvador
Sent: 30 August 2005 14:25
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question
om: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alberto
>Albericio Salvador
>Sent: 30 August 2005 14:25
>To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question
>
>
>Hi Alex,
>
>I like the idea of "Listeners" and they way you
gt;>
>>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alberto
>>Albericio Salvador
>>Sent: 30 August 2005 14:25
>>To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
>>Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question
>
iteration::two
-Original Message-
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alberto
Albericio Salvador
Sent: 30 August 2005 18:32
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Cairngorm question
Hi again,
Im trying to create a business
Alex
Got it. I have it working now and fits quite fine in the Cairngorm
architecture.
Thanks for your help
Alex Uhlmann escribió:
>Alberto,
>
>your responder is probably of type Responder and Responder is the interface
>that only contains onResult and onFault. See Cairngorm docs. I suggest yo
Well if your remote call is returning an object, then u do event.result ... if
its returning a list of objects and u need to access the first, second, etc..
element then do event.result[0]. If its a map, then do event.result["keyname"]
Dimitrios Gianninas
RIA Developer
Optimal Payments Inc.
21 matches
Mail list logo
