Yes. A SWF will always have more overhead than a simple JPG or GIF
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of stldvd
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:11 AM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Efficiency
I have found that the mx.effects classes are very CPU intensive. I
have a project in which I had to replace all of the Move and Fade
effects with my own because they wew causing the CPU ( especially on
Windows ) to choke.
Jamie
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Alex Harui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
File a bug with a test case
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jamie S
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:47 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Efficiency
I have found that the mx.effects
The 'red' is a region that is getting updated. big regions means that you
are triggering large scale displaylist operations which can slow an app
down. If the regions are small - then the performance is more than likely
related to resource allocation. Without some code to see - it is difficult
to
4 matches
Mail list logo
