RE: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Efficiency

2008-07-17 Thread Alex Harui
Yes. A SWF will always have more overhead than a simple JPG or GIF From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of stldvd Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 7:11 AM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Efficiency

Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Efficiency

2008-07-17 Thread Jamie S
I have found that the mx.effects classes are very CPU intensive. I have a project in which I had to replace all of the Move and Fade effects with my own because they wew causing the CPU ( especially on Windows ) to choke. Jamie On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 7:46 AM, Alex Harui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Efficiency

2008-07-17 Thread Alex Harui
File a bug with a test case From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jamie S Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 4:47 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Efficiency I have found that the mx.effects

RE: [flexcoders] Re: Flex Efficiency

2008-06-23 Thread Rick Winscot
The 'red' is a region that is getting updated. big regions means that you are triggering large scale displaylist operations which can slow an app down. If the regions are small - then the performance is more than likely related to resource allocation. Without some code to see - it is difficult to