ndled in one single application.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Nate
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 12:50 PM, Tracy Spratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Do you have a compelling business reason to avoid a straight-forward
>> component architecture?
>>
>>
>>
>>
oups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Nate Beck
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:41 PM
>
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Using view stack to link to mxml
>
>
>
> I agree.. I'm trying to understand exactly why you need separa
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nate Beck
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:41 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Using view stack to link to mxml
I agree.. I'm trying to understand exactly why you need separate swfs.
>
> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Pankaj Arora
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 02, 2008 3:05 PM
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* RE: [flexcoders] Using view stack to link to mxml
>
>
>
> Yes I do have control
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pankaj Arora
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 3:05 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Using view stack to link to mxml
Yes I do have control and can make all of them modules.
But I am not able to understand how to load/unload various modules
Thanks,
Pankaj Arora
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pedro Sena
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 3:17 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Using view stack to link to mxml
Pankaj,
Do you ha
wf
> is loadead and so forth.
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Nate Beck
> *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2008 3:58 PM
>
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [flexcode
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Nate Beck
> *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2008 3:58 PM
>
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Using view stack to link to mxml
>
>
>
> Okay, so just to clarify. You're wanting to communicate from one
>
loadead and so forth.
From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nate Beck
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2008 3:58 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Using view stack to link to mxml
Okay, so just to clarify
;
> *From:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Nate Beck
> *Sent:* Friday, August 29, 2008 3:15 PM
> *To:* flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
> *Subject:* Re: [flexcoders] Using view stack to link to mxml
>
>
>
> I'm a bit confused on how
AIL PROTECTED]:SetCmd(cmdSend);
Send
Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Using view stack to link to mxml
I am sorry I dint explain it well. Let me give you one example.
Two files attached are 2 mxml applications I have in my project. I load
each independently in an .xhtml file.
My requirement is whe
August 29, 2008 3:15 PM
To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Using view stack to link to mxml
I'm a bit confused on how you mean "load another application". You
could either load a Component (compiled into your swf) or a Module
(compiled separate from your appl
I'm a bit confused on how you mean "load another application". You could
either load a Component (compiled into your swf) or a Module
(compiled separate from your application).
>From how I read it, this sounds like you're trying to load one MXML swf
inside of another application. One of the easie
13 matches
Mail list logo