RE: [flexcoders] modelChanged event and mx:Tree

2006-01-21 Thread Matt Chotin
Not sure.  Tree should be much better in Flex 2.  Sorry!   From: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Johannes Nel Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 1:07 PM To: flexcoders@yahoogroups.com Subject: [flexcoders] modelChanged event and mx:Tree   Hi

Re: [flexcoders] modelChanged event and mx:Tree

2006-01-19 Thread Alias
That whole "write your own damn tree component" trick? Snark ;) Alias On 1/18/06, Johannes Nel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All > > I have a model which dispatches the model change event which in turn gets > caught by the mx:Tree (i have established this by subclassing the tree and > checki

RE: [flexcoders] modelChanged event

2005-07-14 Thread Alex Uhlmann
Timing is probably your problem. But anyway there's another solution to accomblish your task you might want to consider. If products is your dataProvider Array then you can bind to it via and handle it via getter / setter properties public function get productsChanged() : Array { ret

RE: [flexcoders] modelChanged event

2005-07-13 Thread Kent Henneuse
I think it stems from the use of an array in databinding. One way to fix this is to reassign your dataprovider. Also you could broadcast a model change event upon completion of the changes. This would hopefully then trigger the sum to change. I had a similar issue a while back and Tracy helped