How does LogMeIn find the specific computer targeted if it does not do
port redirection from the firewall? That is some magic I would like to
understand.
Bob
richard allen wrote:
Do either of the ends of the link require open ports for the
communication? Not having to do this was the r
Thanks, Ken.
Eric and I did a side by side comparison with some flavor of vnc and
the LogMeIn won out. Was that light or tightVNC? I use vnc all over
the office and it works very well over the internal networks.
I am planning on a straight tcp/ip version of the remote that will
only be sendin
Do either of the ends of the link require open ports for the
communication? Not having to do this was the reason I used LogMeIn.
Merry Christmas!
Richard W5SXD
Robert McGwier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(12/24/2005 14:05)
>Many of us here (Phil C, Tom Clark, Rick Hambly, I believe Eric1 now)
Bill,
I much appreciate all the effort within the group and the hard work of Eric, Gerald and others.. But I would like to point out that some of us don't chase DX or run CW at 250 hz wide, but enjoy long QSOs with good friends and the only comfortable way to do that is listening 5 khz or wide
To everyone:
It is time to shut off the computers, turn off the radios and celebrate
the season with loved ones (OK, I know some of you believe the SDR1K
"is" a loved one).
I hope that Santa is good to everyone. Maybe he will leave you that
PerSonus FireBox you have always wanted. Or a drop-in
I know already that RealVNC doesn't play nicely with
DirectX So my question then becomes: - does either
TightVNC or UltraVNC play nicely with DirectX?
Duane
N9DG
__
Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
http://brand.yahoo.
We use CutePDF writer here. It is free and works just like a printer.
Gerald
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert McGwier
> Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 2:11 PM
> To: FlexRadio
> Subject: [Flexradio] Working on my Christmas
I use PrimoPDF, it's free and installs as a printer drivers, so any
software that can print can create a PDF file.
It doesn't add any watermarks or nonsense to your output. I tried
about a dozen ones and this one was the only one that worked well
with all my software.
< http://www.primopdf.c
Hi All
I was going to bite my tongue on this one, but I've got to weigh in. I think
Gerald is very very correct. If anyone should be an audiophile on the list it
should be me. But "I Aint". I come from a background with $200,000.00 SSL
mixers and $80,000.00 Studer tape decks and the like (those
I need a free tool to convert visio output to pdf. I don't need an
offer to do the conversion, I will be using this repeatedly now that
Microsoft has actually fixed the thing. I want a tool for Linux or
Windows that will do the conversion.
I am working on a little present ;-).
Bob
N4HY
--
Many of us here (Phil C, Tom Clark, Rick Hambly, I believe Eric1 now)
use UltraVNC. It does file transfers seamlessly, it will compress
things automatically to transmit them if you have not already. It has a
hook driver that taps the system that really does a bang up job of
compressing the
First, Merry Christmas eve to all!
Recently, someone mentioned that Visual Studio C#
2005 was available as a Christmas download from Microsoft. I did that, along
with DirectX SDK and MDAC 2.8. Last night I tried my first compile with source
from Power V1.5.9. I got 8 errors, 4 warnings and
HO! HO! HO! "Away they all flew till they came into fright"
-- Original message -- From: Frank Brickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > You can see it got a *lot* bigger when we started including all the spyware. > > (Just kidding) > > 73 > Frank > AB2KT > > Joe - AB1DO wrote: >
Also, Bob - N4HY mentioned UltraVNC.
Eric
-- Original message -- From: Ken N9VV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Richard, for your remote operation, you might want to look > at tightVNC. It has some extra .jpg compression features > that could increase your panadapter response: >
You can see it got a *lot* bigger when we started including all the spyware.
(Just kidding)
73
Frank
AB2KT
Joe - AB1DO wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday I got a great birthday present - a new radio (Preview 9)! And
it was the biggest one yet, which prompted me to look at size (in kB)
over time. (se
Hi all,
Yesterday I got a great birthday present - a new
radio (Preview 9)! And it was the biggest one yet, which prompted me to look at size (in kB) over time. (see below). I
only jumped on this band waggon in overdrive in late May, so that's as far as my
analysis stretches back. Also the
Richard, for your remote operation, you might want to look
at tightVNC. It has some extra .jpg compression features
that could increase your panadapter response:
http://www.tightvnc.com/
de Ken N9VV
richard allen wrote:
The Skype voip stuff for the audio is pretty low bandwidth and would
wor
The Skype voip stuff for the audio is pretty low bandwidth and would
work well over dialup. The LogMeIn screen and control stuff would be
a bit sluggish but would probably be usable if you did not care about
the panadaptor display window. I'll need to reconfigure my laptop
for dialup and give
Richard:
You know they say about you?
YOOO DA MANNN!
73's
Bob
richard allen wrote:
Several folks have asked me about remote operations for an sdr1000.
http://flex-radio.com/download_files/PowerSDR/Docs/SDR_Remote.pdf
outlines some basics.
My system has just started operation this week
Preview 9 loaded and runs OK so far.
Gateway 3.3 GHz, D44.
Thanks for a great year.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all you Flexers out there.
Bob
K8MLM
In a message dated 12/22/2005 5:53:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please
see the following link
Several folks have asked me about remote operations for an sdr1000.
http://flex-radio.com/download_files/PowerSDR/Docs/SDR_Remote.pdf
outlines some basics.
My system has just started operation this week and is described here.
I have a 100 w sdr1000 operating in remote service. I use Skype for
21 matches
Mail list logo
