Re: [Flexradio] U/V sub-audible tone problem

2012-09-25 Thread Brian Lloyd
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 8:41 PM, John Vandenberg wrote: > Did you try using the 10-band EQ to knock down the audio spectrum below >> 250Hz? Yes, I know that is a hack but it might make it tolerable. >> >> No I have not. It likely would work. However I think a "Flex" could do > better then that.

Re: [Flexradio] flex owners running JT65..a question

2012-09-25 Thread Ernest Garcia
I leave the AGC on Med and the Preamp on 30-6 meters. The AGC-T I average 65-80 depending on which band. The VAC1 RX Gain: 0 (zero) I have decoded signals as low as -28 ... last night worked all over Europe and Asia and most signals were - 20 plus. I am using a 5 band dipole for 20-10 meter,

[Flexradio] U/V sub-audible tone problem

2012-09-25 Thread John Vandenberg
On 9/25/2012 1:00 PM, flexradio-requ...@flex-radio.biz wrote: -- Message: 13 Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 22:18:52 -0700 From: Brian Lloyd To: John Vandenberg Cc: FlexRadio Mailings Subject: Re: [Flexradio] U/V sub-audible tone problem Message-ID: Content-Type: t

Re: [Flexradio] flex owners running JT65..a question

2012-09-25 Thread Jim - W4YXU
I have been running Jt65 on 30 thru 10 and about a month or so ago i experimented with AGC and now use it set to "long" with AGC-T wide open - breaks all rule from 50 years back etc. But I set the input to JT65 by using the VAC RX Gain. I will usually decode as many as 9 or 10 signals if they a

[Flexradio] flex owners running JT65..a question

2012-09-25 Thread bill
I just read a comment on the JT65 list about 'never' using AGC with JT65. Not sure of the reason for this. But would like to ask and Flexonians who run JT65 what they do? Use AGC, if so why and what settings? Do not use AGC, if so why not Pse remember, I'm slow, technologically challenged, and

[Flexradio] Some questions about the NR and NB functions

2012-09-25 Thread Mark Lunday
I have read the threads about the following: * Setting AGC-T * Optimized NR and NB settings I did some tinkering, but I would appreciate some additional guidance. What I observed: * I have a TS570D and a TS480. Both have NR1 and NR2 adaptive noise reduction. I found NR2 to be

Re: [Flexradio] D-104 with Flex 5K

2012-09-25 Thread manualman
The high impedance crystal cartridge of the D-104, if it is in reasonably decent electrical condition, can drive the Line In (5K impedance) input. Frequency response can be further tailored in the PowerSDR Equalizer form. For the mike settings, I started with the default D-104 settings and then did

[Flexradio] Fw: Virtural Cables

2012-09-25 Thread ROGER SCHMITT
- Forwarded Message - From: ROGER SCHMITT To: "flexradio-requ...@flex-radio.biz" Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 11:42 AM Subject: Virtural Cables Since downloading Version 5.0 I can not get the program to recognize the virtual cables box, the only selection is Com port 5 or non

[Flexradio] VSPE question

2012-09-25 Thread Alan Zabarsky
I am trying to get Bobs S-meter and HRD to run on PowerSDR at the same time using - VSPE in the splitter mode and can't get it to work, i.e., I can't get spoliator set up so both apps play at once. Is anybody have it working that can share the secret with me?? 73 de W1APZ __

[Flexradio] test

2012-09-25 Thread Alan Zabarsky
___ FlexRadio Systems Mailing List FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/ Knowledge Base: http://kc.flexradio.com/ Homepage: http://

Re: [Flexradio] D-104 and fax with Flex 5K

2012-09-25 Thread Lee Mushel
Well, first, let me expand on my initial casual comments on use of the D-104 and the Flex5000A. I have set things up so that everything is shielded/properly grounded. I even went so far as to put the 13.8 power cable in double density shielding. I am trying to learn how to use the full dup

Re: [Flexradio] D-104 with Flex 5K

2012-09-25 Thread Bob Kay
Line in? For a mic level signal? Seems strange. How about the large impedance mismatch? On Tuesday, September 25, 2012, wrote: > The D-104 that I use is an unamplified mike. However, it's simple enough > to bypass the preamp in the mike stand if you have one. I'm not sure why > you would you even