I read a disturbing post on the TS-2000 reflector claiming that the legacy Flex
radio’s pollute the
bands with noise….it claimed that the Flex-5000, 3000 and 1500 are by far the
worst of any modern
radio.
The poster also said that under no circumstances should a Flex be used with an
I have decided to put my 1500 up for sale and move on to something
else. Its in mint condition and comes with original box and all
cables. I am not a smoker and there is no smoking in the shack but
there is a smoker in the house (unfortunately) so I can't say it's
totally from a non smoker
Looks all the world to me like somebody with an agenda and an axe to
grind. I don't know for sure but the tone of the writing sure reminds
me of a poster over on e-ham who has been screaming about transmitter
IMD performance for years. He never talks about anything else and most
of us have
(Sorry... meant to send this to the reflector too!)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Greg Jurrens g...@flexradio.com
Date: Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Flex radios are the worst polluters ??
To: John Kramer jkra...@iafrica.com
John:
This set of complaints
Greg
Thank you very much for your response, it does somewhat put my mind at ease. I
was
not aware that this complaint has been circulating for some time now - it is
the first I
have heard of it.
Being a responsible ham, I always strive to transmit the cleanest signal that I
possibly can….and
The original article claimed that the problem arose at UHF frequencies, and
suggested that transverters shouldn't be used with the Flex.
As expected, many hams did not read the entire article, and now claim that
Flex's are a polluter.
Tell me, have you ever seen evidence of this? Has anyone
This thread is hardly worth the bandwidth!
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® III mini, an ATT 4G LTE smartphone
Original message
From: Jim Jannuzzo jsqu...@msn.com
Date:04/22/2014 2:45 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: John Kramer jkra...@iafrica.com,flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re:
7 matches
Mail list logo
