> Larry,
>
> I put the build logs for a virgin build of 1.4.5 Preview 16 created by
> Visual Studio at: http://tracey.org/wjt/temp/buildlogs.zip
>
> Looks like it has all the info you need to build the C pieces with the
> command line compilers.
>
> Regards,
>
> Bill (kd5tfd)
>
I'll give it a try
Larry,
I put the build logs for a virgin build of 1.4.5 Preview 16 created by
Visual Studio at: http://tracey.org/wjt/temp/buildlogs.zip
Looks like it has all the info you need to build the C pieces with the
command line compilers.
Regards,
Bill (kd5tfd)
At 10:53 AM 3/9/2006, [EMAIL PROTE
I tried that route for a while, trying to make do with a substitute,
and after messing with it for a while I come to the conclusion that
life is too short to spend months messing with something that will
never be compatible with what the programmers are doing.
I just bit the bullet and recentl
I've received several notes suggesting we go to SharpDevelop or even to
Mono as an alternative to the MS products.
I had thought about it in passing, but with several bringing it up, I've
thought about it some more and I want to say, in public, that I don't
think we should do this.
In the end, a
Bill Tracey wrote:
Comments in line
Bill (kd5tfd)
At 10:27 PM 3/8/2006, Larry Loen wrote:
<>
Bill Tracey wrote:
the projects above are C projects -- they don't distribute the tree
as a built tree - it's a clean source tree
Right. But, somewhere I remember (perhaps wrongly) a claim
Comments in line
Bill (kd5tfd)
At 10:27 PM 3/8/2006, Larry Loen wrote:
<>
Bill Tracey wrote:
the projects above are C projects -- they don't distribute the tree as a
built tree - it's a clean source tree
Right. But, somewhere I remember (perhaps wrongly) a claim that the C#
IDE had an
I just checked. I do have NMAKE installed. I don't know what installed
it, but I presume it is C#, though maybe it was the Borland compiler.
Version is 1.62.7022 for whatever that's worth.
I'll try some sort of simple test to see if I can compile something with
a simple makefile (this corres
Tim Ellison wrote:
Larry,
I just recently started "rolling my own" and using VS .NET 2003, I had
no problem selecting the PowerSDR.sln file under "Source" and Build
Solution built all 6 of the projects listed in PowerSDR.sln with no
problems.
BTW, I believe rev 300 is Preview 16. Everything a
Comments inline.
Bill (kd5tfd)
At 08:39 PM 3/8/2006, Larry Loen wrote:
This evening, I decided to do a little experimenting with the source.
<...>
DttSp.vcproj
PA19.vcproj
PortTalk.vcproj
pthread.vcproj
fftw_wisdom.vcproj
You're using just C# -- the projects above are C projects -- they d
ove is beta 17
-Tim
---
Tim Ellison ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Integrated Technical Services ( http://www.itsco.com )
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Larry Loen
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 9:39 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flex
This evening, I decided to do a little experimenting with the source.
Forgive me if this repeats something I should have remembered from
earlier postings, but it isn't working well.
To obtain some structure (as opposed to just doing random source file
reading), I thought I'd build the project
11 matches
Mail list logo
