Jim Lux wrote:
At 05:58 AM 1/19/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Jim Lux wrote:
Of course... the SDR1000 does have an advantage because it's a very
simple receiver with fewer stages to screw things up.
While the SDR-1000 can do a credible job on its own, I just want to
reinforce that anyo
At 05:58 AM 1/19/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Jim Lux wrote:
Of course... the SDR1000 does have an advantage because it's a very
simple receiver with fewer stages to screw things up.
While the SDR-1000 can do a credible job on its own, I just want to
reinforce that anyone with a signal g
Jim Lux wrote:
Of course... the SDR1000 does have an advantage because it's a very
simple receiver with fewer stages to screw things up.
While the SDR-1000 can do a credible job on its own, I just want to
reinforce that anyone with a signal generator that's locked to a decent
reference, and
Eric Ellison wrote:
Folks
Just autta send this whole message thread to ARRL. It really is not that
much fun if the equipment you have evolved at great cost and enjoyment, is
FOO_BAR to the 'standard' being transmitted!
Jim, can't you convince JPL folks to send this test? It more or less is a
go
At 06:44 PM 1/18/2006, Eric Ellison wrote:
Folks
Just autta send this whole message thread to ARRL. It really is not that
much fun if the equipment you have evolved at great cost and enjoyment, is
FOO_BAR to the 'standard' being transmitted!
Jim, can't you convince JPL folks to send this test?
At 06:10 PM 1/18/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Jim Lux said the following on 01/18/2006 07:36 PM:
> At 04:24 PM 1/18/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
> As I recall, you can measure the phase of a tone with an uncertainty of
> 1/sqrt(T * CNR), where T is the integration time, and CNR is the ca
N8UR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 9:11 PM
To: Jim Lux
Cc: Eric Ellison; 'Joe - AB1DO'; FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL FMT: one more win for the SDR-1000
Jim Lux said the following on 01/18/2006 07:36 PM:
> At 0
Jim Lux said the following on 01/18/2006 07:36 PM:
> At 04:24 PM 1/18/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
>
>> Eric Ellison said the following on 01/18/2006 07:01 PM:
>>
>> > Anybody ever wonder if folks out here have even better equipment
>> than ARRL
>> > for generating the test?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
I missed the '05 FMT, had put the date down on my calendar but forgot to
adjust for UTC so was off by a day this year and missed it.
I did run the FMT in '03 and '04 calibrating a TS 2000 to WWV and CHU and
using Spectrum Lab for the analysis. Scored in the .01 to .04 ppm range -
respectable
At 04:24 PM 1/18/2006, John Ackermann N8UR wrote:
Eric Ellison said the following on 01/18/2006 07:01 PM:
> Anybody ever wonder if folks out here have even better equipment than ARRL
> for generating the test?
>
>
>
> Sort of would be fun for folks like yourself, Tom, JPL?, John or others,
> wit
At 04:01 PM 1/18/2006, you wrote:
Jim
You sure know how to rain on the parade LOL!
Naaah.. I think Jan got lucky and happened to measure when the
propagation was just right. And he corrected me, the computer was
an old PC his wife used to use.
Congrats Jan!
I talked with Bill KD5TFD
Eric Ellison said the following on 01/18/2006 07:01 PM:
> Anybody ever wonder if folks out here have even better equipment than ARRL
> for generating the test?
>
>
>
> Sort of would be fun for folks like yourself, Tom, JPL?, John or others,
> with access to millions of dollars in equipment to
Eric Ellison said the following on 01/18/2006 06:40 PM:
> Spent some enjoyable time on John Ackerman's website today, looking at his
> time stuff and measurement set up. I wonder if he used the SDR-1000 with his
> laboratory?
We used the SDR-1000 as a monitor receiver since the technique we were
: Joe - AB1DO;
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] ARRL FMT:
one more win for the SDR-1000
At 05:04 PM 1/18/2006, Joe - AB1DO wrote:
Hi all,
ARRL
held its Frequency Measurement Test on November 17 at 0245 UTC. The test
involved transmitting a single
dnesday, January 18, 2006
8:04 PM
To: FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: [Flexradio] ARRL FMT: one
more win for the SDR-1000
Hi all,
ARRL held its Frequency Measurement Test on November 17 at
0245 UTC. The test involved transmitting a single tone in SSB at a
predetermined carrie
At 05:04 PM 1/18/2006, Joe - AB1DO wrote:
Hi
all,
ARRL held its Frequency Measurement Test on
November 17 at 0245 UTC. The test involved transmitting a single tone in
SSB at a predetermined carrier frequency. The objective of the test was
to figure out the exact frequency of the tone W1AW was
Hi all,
ARRL held its Frequency Measurement Test on
November 17 at 0245 UTC. The test involved transmitting a single tone in SSB at
a predetermined carrier frequency. The objective of the test was to figure out
the exact frequency of the tone W1AW was transmitting.
I decided to give it a
17 matches
Mail list logo
