Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor

2011-07-26 Thread EB4APL
Ray, Thank you for your response, I really appreciate it and your database transfer utility. Maybe I didn't explained well myself about your decision of not incorporating the function, I was not complaining and I really understand your reasons. In fact something like the procedure that you

Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor

2011-07-25 Thread Ray, K9DUR
Ignacio, I said that it would not be incorporated into SDRDataTransfer because it would be a "throwaway" function. That is, you would only need to use it once & then never again. I had actually started to develop a standalone utility that would do the conversion. Again, I stopped working on it

Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor

2011-07-25 Thread EB4APL
ent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 4:19 PM To: 'Dick3' ; flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor I agree! It is a very clumsy process. Also it would be nice to have the Windows text shortcuts available, such as cut, copy, and paste. Fred W2VQS ---

Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor

2011-07-24 Thread Fred Howell
Thank you, Tim. Fred -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Tim Ellison, W4TME Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 4:33 PM To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor Everyone&#

Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor

2011-07-24 Thread Stan
Thanks Tim! Stan -Original Message- From: Tim Ellison, W4TME Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 5:32 PM To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor Everyone's suggestions regarding improvements to the memory form are duly noted and have bee

Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor

2011-07-24 Thread Tim Ellison, W4TME
.@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Dick3 Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 2:55 PM To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor The Memory Selection in version .5 is fatal to an operator that changes hf frequencies often...it takes four selections and two major excursion

Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor

2011-07-24 Thread Michael M. Moore
.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Stan Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 3:48 PM To: Fred Howell; 'Dick3'; flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor I think there should be a memory button on all the modes and band screens! Just click the

Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor

2011-07-24 Thread Stan
27; ; flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor I agree! It is a very clumsy process. Also it would be nice to have the Windows text shortcuts available, such as cut, copy, and paste. Fred W2VQS -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.b

Re: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor

2011-07-24 Thread Fred Howell
24, 2011 2:55 PM To: flexradio@flex-radio.biz Subject: [Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor The Memory Selection in version .5 is fatal to an operator that changes hf frequencies often...it takes four selections and two major excursions of the desktop to select a frequency!!! In past

[Flexradio] Memory Selection 2.1.5 is poor

2011-07-24 Thread Dick3
The Memory Selection in version .5 is fatal to an operator that changes hf frequencies often...it takes four selections and two major excursions of the desktop to select a frequency!!! In past versions, a double click on the desired frequency and you were good to goany help heretnx ...Di