you might want to check out my XP optimization webpage where I have
pointers to some great Load assignment and "affinity" utilities.
http://www.n9vv.com/XP-optimization.html
de ken n9vv
Rick Markey, KN3C wrote:
> John,
>
> No, don't have any idea how the load is split between the cores.
> Ken, N9VV, is correct. He has done us all a real service with his notes
on XP optimizations on his web site.
> Number 15 on the instruction list may be the most helpful.
>
> http://www.n9vv.com/XP-optimization.html
>
>
If that is the approach people feel the need to perform, I recommend
purchasi
Larry, please forgive me, but I strongly disagree with the "throw
more hardware" at the problem to fix it. There is a three letter
mega-company who has made 50+ successful years by following that
schematic :-) and correspondingly cost it's customers mega-bucks!.
**You DO NOT need to REMEMBER wh
Not everyone can afford to keep upgrading the hardware everytime
Microsoft
comes out with the next even more bloated OS.
Multiple profiles is very simple, while I'm on my trip I will try to
write an
example, but I can't make any guarantees.
I have to socialize with the other companies crews oth
> Larry, please forgive me, but I strongly disagree with the "throw
> more hardware" at the problem to fix it. There is a three letter
> mega-company who has made 50+ successful years by following that
> schematic :-) and correspondingly cost it's customers mega-bucks!.
>
I can build, pretty much
I noticed that Larry did not tell you which big blueish three letter
company he works for.
;-).
Bob
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Larry, please forgive me, but I strongly disagree with the "throw
>> more hardware" at the problem to fix it. There is a three letter
>> mega-company who has made 50
On 07/18/06 05:19 pm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Larry, please forgive me, but I strongly disagree with the "throw
>> more hardware" at the problem to fix it. There is a three letter
>> mega-company who has made 50+ successful years by following that
>> schematic :-) and correspondingly cost it's
[snip]
> So what do you make of the second QST review, where the author expressed
> regrets that they had settled for the Celeron (2.4GHz??) rather than
> going for the P4 (2.8GHz to 3.2GHz??)? He found the performance with
> "only" a 2.xGHz Celeron disappointing.
>
> Alan NV8A
>
MHz isn't everyt
Since I shot off my mouth about a 200 dollar upgrade, a private note
effectively challenged me to go find it.
Now, when I was doing 200 dollar upgrades, I was really paying close
attention to the products and the market and so on.
This is more like one hour wonder stuff, so there may be some doll
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> radio.biz] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:31 PM
> To: Flex Radio Reflector
> Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Dual Core Optimization
>
> Since I shot off my mouth about a 200 dollar upgrade, a private note
> effectively
>Any of my betters want to tell me that this won't match my glitch-free P
>IV 2.4 gig Intel?
Larry,
Here's the deal of the day. Hurry before they are all gone. Gateway is
blowin out last weeks Pent 4 machines, and converted there current product
line to all dual core. So you can buy a Tower ca
To: Flex Radio Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Dual Core Optimization
Since I shot off my mouth about a 200 dollar upgrade, a private note
effectively challenged me to go find it.
Now, when I was doing 200 dollar upgrades, I was really paying close
attention to the products and the market and so on
this machine compared with my other machines.
73
Mike - KM0T
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Flex Radio Reflector"
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Dual Core Optimization
>Any of my bet
Tim Ellison wrote:
>Larry,
>
>I understand your reasoning and the materials list below is a good one,
>but let's be a little more real world in the pricing and required
>components. The box actually has to run the PowerSDR software to be
>functional. This would be, as I assume, a second box dedi
http://www.itsco.com )
-Original Message-
From: Larry Loen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 3:56 PM
To: Tim Ellison; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Dual Core Optimization
Tim Ellison wrote:
>Larry,
>
>I understand your reasoning and the materi
15 matches
Mail list logo
