RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Makefile.am / autoconf problems

2001-12-28 Thread Norman Vine
Derek Lisoski writes: > >>>Maybe Im back to looking at mounting binary volumes >>>to be able to use the older automake >>>and autoconf versions? > >>Well I would reccomend doing this anyway esp. if you > >I bit the bullet, and did a clean re-install of the >latest Cygwin, >And then.. it worked f

[Flightgear-devel] Re: Makefile.am / autoconf problems

2001-12-28 Thread Derek Lisoski
Ok, you guys lost me about 5 posts back, but since I started this I figured I better report back... > Norman Vine wrote: > > > [snip] >cd $FG_SRC >rm config.cache >rm -f *.lnk # remove symlinked auto* files >ls -la *.lnk # just to make sure they got removed ># you might have to remove them o

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Doc: How to position objects in FlightGear scenery

2001-12-28 Thread Norman Vine
Marcio Shimoda writes: > >> Yes, well not really a wavefront .obj file but a FGFS >> Scenery File which is a slightly modified version of >> the wavefront .obj file but close enough :-) > >Where I get more information about these modifications? Marcio Here is a slightly 'outdated' doc http://ww

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Change in Canonical Build Proceedure ???

2001-12-28 Thread Norman Vine
Curtis L. Olson writes: > >Norman Vine writes: >> It appears as if recent changes in the CVS requires a >> modification in the steps for building FGFS >> >> 1) for now, with Cygwin at least, you NEED to add >> >> AC_PREREQ(2.13) >> >> as the first REAL LINE in configure.in >> I am investigating

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Change in Canonical Build Proceedure ???

2001-12-28 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Norman Vine writes: > It appears as if recent changes in the CVS requires a > modification in the steps for building FGFS > > 1) for now, with Cygwin at least, you NEED to add > > AC_PREREQ(2.13) > > as the first REAL LINE in configure.in > I am investigating this as it shouldn't be necess

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Doc: How to position objects in FlightGear scenery

2001-12-28 Thread Marcio Shimoda
> Yes, well not really a wavefront .obj file but a FGFS > Scenery File which is a slightly modified version of > the wavefront .obj file but close enough :-) Where I get more information about these modifications? Thanx in advance. Marcio Shimoda _

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Doc: How to position objects in FlightGear scenery

2001-12-28 Thread Norman Vine
Marcio Shimoda writes: > >> To edit KLVK, extract KLVK.btg.gz, leaving the .gz file where it is. >> Say btg2atg KLVK to convert the binary KLVK.btg into the ascii >> KLVK.atg. > >This atg file is the wavefront obj file? Yes, well not really a wavefront .obj file but a FGFS Scenery File which is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Doc: How to position objects in FlightGear scenery

2001-12-28 Thread Marcio Shimoda
> To edit KLVK, extract KLVK.btg.gz, leaving the .gz file where it is. > Say btg2atg KLVK to convert the binary KLVK.btg into the ascii > KLVK.atg.I create a new "work" directory where I put this. > Create a directory "textures" under this and put all the needed > textures in there. Load KLVK.atg

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Change in Canonical Build Proceedure ???

2001-12-28 Thread Bernie Bright
Norman Vine wrote: > > It appears as if recent changes in the CVS requires a > modification in the steps for building FGFS > > 1) for now, with Cygwin at least, you NEED to add > > AC_PREREQ(2.13) > > as the first REAL LINE in configure.in > I am investigating this as it shouldn't be necessa

RE: [Flightgear-devel] New materials file format

2001-12-28 Thread Norman Vine
David Megginson writes: > >For anyone not monitoring the CVS logs, I've just replaced the old >$FG_ROOT/materials file with a new $FG_ROOT/materials.xml file, using >the regular property-file format !! Warning what seems to be my 'obligatory' follows !! So now any program wanting to parse the FG

[Flightgear-devel] Change in Canonical Build Proceedure ???

2001-12-28 Thread Norman Vine
It appears as if recent changes in the CVS requires a modification in the steps for building FGFS 1) for now, with Cygwin at least, you NEED to add AC_PREREQ(2.13) as the first REAL LINE in configure.in I am investigating this as it shouldn't be necessary 2) Everyone NEEDS to run autohea

RE: [Flightgear-devel] SITREP

2001-12-28 Thread jsb
> Jon S. Berndt writes: > > What a good looking baby boy! Congratulations. I hope everyone is doing > > well. > > > > We're two weeks from twin boys being born, ourselves. I still don't have two > > good boys names in hand ... > > How about "Spit" and "Spat" or maybe that should be "FGSpit" and

RE: [Flightgear-devel] SITREP

2001-12-28 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Jon S. Berndt writes: > What a good looking baby boy! Congratulations. I hope everyone is doing > well. > > We're two weeks from twin boys being born, ourselves. I still don't have two > good boys names in hand ... How about "Spit" and "Spat" or maybe that should be "FGSpit" and "FGSpat"? Curt.

[Flightgear-devel] LWCE '02

2001-12-28 Thread John Check
Hey Guys, We're starting to get down to the wire for LWCE in NY this year so now would be a good time to let me know if you are planning to attend (or thinking about it) or help out at the booth so we can make arrangements for passes. Contact me directly for more info. TTYL John __

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SITREP

2001-12-28 Thread John Check
On Friday 28 December 2001 01:41 am, you wrote: > Well, I just wanted to brag on my first born (you can see him at > http://unbeatenpath.net/) and let you guys know I may be a bit busy with > RL for an undetermined number of days (weeks?). Thanks Congratulations on a job well done ;) __

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [OT] Babies

2001-12-28 Thread Erik Hofman
>> some other choices, that's likely what they will be. Not that there is >> anything wrong with those names at all, but I want more choices. I >> have to >> pick middle names, too. Cameron: how did you come up with your baby's >> name? >> Family name? Famous artists ... (but maybe Elvis isn

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [OT] Babies

2001-12-28 Thread Erik Hofman
Jon S. Berndt wrote: >>>We're two weeks from twin boys being born, ourselves. I still >>>don't have two good boys names in hand ... >>> >>Ehm, how about .. >> >>Erik >> > > > As a matter of fact, we have two interim names that we refer to them as > prior to birth: Erik and Max (short for Maximu

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [OT] Babies

2001-12-28 Thread Erik Hofman
Jon S. Berndt wrote: >>>We're two weeks from twin boys being born, ourselves. I still >>>don't have two good boys names in hand ... >>> >>Ehm, how about .. >> >>Erik >> > As a matter of fact, we have two interim names that we refer to them as > prior to birth: Erik and Max (short for Maximus). I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SITREP

2001-12-28 Thread Derrell . Lipman
Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I just wanted to brag on my first born (you can see him at > http://unbeatenpath.net/) and let you guys know I may be a bit busy with > RL for an undetermined number of days (weeks?). Thanks My first born popped out a little over 8 months ago, a

[Flightgear-devel] [OT] Babies

2001-12-28 Thread Jon S. Berndt
> > We're two weeks from twin boys being born, ourselves. I still > > don't have two good boys names in hand ... > > Ehm, how about .. > > Erik As a matter of fact, we have two interim names that we refer to them as prior to birth: Erik and Max (short for Maximus). If I don't come up with some o

Re: [Flightgear-devel] SITREP

2001-12-28 Thread Erik Hofman
Jon: > We're two weeks from twin boys being born, ourselves. I still don't have two > good boys names in hand ... Ehm, how about .. Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-dev

RE: [Flightgear-devel] SITREP

2001-12-28 Thread Jon S. Berndt
> Well, I just wanted to brag on my first born (you can see him at > http://unbeatenpath.net/) and let you guys know I may be a bit busy with > RL for an undetermined number of days (weeks?). Thanks What a good looking baby boy! Congratulations. I hope everyone is doing well. We're two weeks fr