Erik Hofman writes:
Jon Stockill wrote:
Is anyone else having a problem accessing this?
Yes. This is know and will probably be fixed tonight or tomorrow (Curtis
isn't able to access the server until then).
Ok, this should be fixed. Sorry that took me so long to get to ... I
was out of
Curtis L. Olson writes:
- Added a redundant (left/right) vacuum pump.
Is this optional? Many (most?) low-end singles have only a single
vacuum pump, though the newest Cessna 172R/S has two.
- Modified the rpm vs. suction formula to hit much more realistic numbers.
We should be seeing
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Modified Files:
default.ils.gz
Log Message:
Align all the approaches I could automatically match up to runways.
Where we have exact data on the lat/lon of the localizer and GS, we
should use it, and fix our airport data if there's a discrepancy;
where we're
David Megginson writes:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Modified Files:
default.ils.gz
Log Message:
Align all the approaches I could automatically match up to runways.
Where we have exact data on the lat/lon of the localizer and GS, we
should use it, and fix our airport data if
David Megginson writes:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
- Added a redundant (left/right) vacuum pump.
Is this optional? Many (most?) low-end singles have only a single
vacuum pump, though the newest Cessna 172R/S has two.
I suppose these things should eventually move into some sort of
Curtis L. Olson writes:
The problem is that I have two data sets both providing exact
locations for the localizer and both disagreeing significantly on the
position and orientation. :-(
We have to decide on the authority of each data point individually.
Anything that we get from the DAFIF
David Megginson writes:
We have to decide on the authority of each data point individually.
Anything that we get from the DAFIF or FAA data should stand as-is,
for example. For Robin Peel's data, we should fix things only when
there is a known problem.
The problem is that in my spot
Curtis L. Olson writes:
I don't know if either DAFIF or FAA could be considered
authoritative.
I'd consider FAA authoritative for U.S. airports, and DAFIF for other
countries, again, until proven otherwise.
I'm guessing that when an ILS is installed, someone goes out and
stands at the
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I can wait Curt. Don't do that especially for me.
Thanks anyway
-Fred
Fred,
Those binary file flags should be all fixed. Let me know if you have any more
problems.
Best,
Jim
___
Flightgear-devel
Well I found a source for free p-51d sounds: http://theghostfiles.org/CFS3SFX.html
The Merlin sounds have been added to CVS. I played around with them quite a
bit and have...well you'll have to listen. They are very good samples,
especially for the intial starting and idling. Someone with
By the way, is all the data consistent ? Everyone uses WGS-84, right ?
As far as I know, when an ILS is installed, they have an aircraft fly the
approach with the needles centered, and at the same time, they use optical
means to measure the path of the aircraft from the theoretical impact
point,
11 matches
Mail list logo
