On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 20:24, David Culp wrote:
> > Matthew Johnson wrote:
> > Animal could be a Swallow...
>
> African or European?
>
Errr..I don't know...
Matt
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/l
Martin Spott wrote:
David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matthew Johnson wrote:
Animal could be a Swallow...
African or European?
As far as I know the European swallows stay in Africa during European winter
- did I mix up anything ? ;-)
I think the correct answer was "I don´t know ar
David Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Matthew Johnson wrote:
>> Animal could be a Swallow...
> African or European?
As far as I know the European swallows stay in Africa during European winter
- did I mix up anything ? ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who
Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Very nice indeed! Still making my model, and am way too embaressed to
> show anything of it. Well one of two models...Want to also release an
> F104 model as in theory it should be easier to do :). Its just a missile
> with a couple of small wings added
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I've read through some documents and found one fairly interesting
> document on the subject which explains why we should model it ourselves
> after all:
>
> http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/moonbig.html
>
> http://www.griffithobs.org/IPSMoonIllus.htm
> Matthew Johnson wrote:
> Animal could be a Swallow...
African or European?
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Martin Spott writes:
> Been there a few times around 1990. Even the business days where
> that much crowded that I decided not to spent too much effort to go
> there. And most of the nice gimmicks were _much_ too expensive
> (thinking of Microturbo :-) Hey, anyone interested in a political
>
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 09:25, Martin Spott wrote:
> > p.s. Why isn't there an O'Reilly FlightGear book yet? What mascot
> > should they use?
>
> Do we have a FlightGear icon for Windows-/KDE-/Gnome-Desktops ? ;-)
>
FlightGear icon...What would that look like, if I had the money a
competition w
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 07:31, Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
> Martin Spott wrote:
> > > Just an update on the A320 model :
> >
> > > http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-02.png
> > > http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-03.png
> >
> > Hmmm, I _like_ your patriotism ;-)
>
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. We need people to go over paper lists and airport diagrams for
> countries that don't publish air navigation data free online
> (i.e. almost everyone but the U.S.) and fill in the blanks in our
> navaid and airport databases.
Unfortunately this invo
"Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you haven't taken a look at our "installation and getting started
> guide" (available in the docs section of the web site) please have a
> read through that. It addresses many items on your list given below.
> Unfortunately, for personal reasons,
Richard A Downing FBCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since XML seems to come naturally to people around here, why not set up a
> FlightGear-The-Book projectin a cvs repository? Then people can get html,
> pdf and whatever else formats. Or you could use LaTeX.
The "Getting Started" manual is writ
Jon S Berndt wrote
> Frederic BOUVIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Martin Spott wrote:
> >> > Just an update on the A320 model :
> >>
> >> >
> >>http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-02.png
> >> >
> >>http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-03.png
>
> What was the f
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:31:22 +0200 (CEST)
Frederic BOUVIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
> Just an update on the A320 model :
>
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-02.png
>
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-03.png
What was the flight model for
Frederic BOUVIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On a related topic, it is just the time of the Paris Air Show :
> http://www.salon-du-bourget.fr/
Been there a few times around 1990. Even the business days where that much
crowded that I decided not to spent too much effort to go there. And most of
t
David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We did some profiling a while ago, but unless you're running a
> superfast card (like Norman Vine), you're limited by the speed of your
> GPU, not your CPU.
No, I don't believe you're right here - or probably we have different
interpretation of "super
Frederic Bouvier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I am searching material on the web to make textures, and
> often, we have to ask permission to use an image or a
> drawing that is not free nor in the public domain.
>
> Is it acceptable for us that the owner of the material
> wants to restrict the usa
Martin Spott wrote:
> > Just an update on the A320 model :
>
> > http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-02.png
> > http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fgfs-03.png
>
> Hmmm, I _like_ your patriotism ;-)
Thanks,
On a related topic, it is just the time of the Paris Air Sho
> I'm not certain if the size of data types such as ints and pointers
> will expand to 64-bits in the compiler. I don't find that likely since
I'm pretty sure that pointers are 64 bit on most 64 bit architectures.
Likewise, long int. int is normally still 32 bit.
Code that assumes anything abo
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Hello,
I am searching material on the web to make textures, and
often, we have to ask permission to use an image or a
drawing that is not free nor in the public domain.
Is it acceptable for us that the owner of the material
wants to restrict the usage for FlightGear only ?
Hello,
I am searching material on the web to make textures, and
often, we have to ask permission to use an image or a
drawing that is not free nor in the public domain.
Is it acceptable for us that the owner of the material
wants to restrict the usage for FlightGear only ?
I know that GPL allow t
Hi,
I've read through some documents and found one fairly interesting
document on the subject which explains why we should model it ourselves
after all:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/moonbig.html
http://www.griffithobs.org/IPSMoonIllus.html
Over the years, many visitors to the l.S.U.
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I notice the optical illusion subtlely in flightgear as it is. Please
change this back to the way it was. We shouldn't make the sun/moon
artificially larger at the horizon. If you do anything, squash it a
little vertically, but that's it.
It also shows up in photographs,
Erik Hofman writes:
> Christian Mayer wrote:
>
> > The reason why the moon looks bigger is an sort of optical illusion.
> > Because you've got reference points on the horizon like trees and
> > building your eyes tell you the moon is quite big. And when the moon is
> > high above you you don't
Norman Vine wrote:
Ah yes..., optical illusion are convincing
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2002/24jun_moonillusion.htm
or else they wouldn't be called 'illusions' now would they :-)
I've already read this part. But I don't really care if the effect is an
illusion or not, if it is there in r
Christian Mayer wrote:
Any pilot flying on the back (fighter pilots do that occasionally as
well air acrobats) will be like looking bended over through his legs.
I didn't mention any pants ...
So do you take care of that? Does the effect get smaller when the pilot
begins to roll?
That would be e
26 matches
Mail list logo
