On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 20:00:06 -0500,
"Jon Berndt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > When Grand Slam was dropped the fuselage 'jumped' upwards quite
> > radically.
>
> What's "Grand Slam"?
..a WWII fly swat. ;-)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt
> When Grand Slam was dropped the fuselage 'jumped' upwards quite
> radically.
What's "Grand Slam"?
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Wed, 20 Aug 2003 00:19:52 +0100 (BST), Jon Stockill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Gene Buckle wrote:
>
>> Makes you wonder if there's any pictures of the hole that sucker made when
>> it went off. :)
>
>Well, according to google:
>
>http://www.dambusters.org.uk/bielefeld.htm
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Gene Buckle wrote:
> Makes you wonder if there's any pictures of the hole that sucker made when
> it went off. :)
Well, according to google:
http://www.dambusters.org.uk/bielefeld.htm
100ft deep crater is fairly impressive.
--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
> > > And then you hang 22,000lbs of bomb under one and it gets...
> > >
> > > ...interesting.
> > >
> > > http://www.johnmullen.org.uk/aerospce/pics/bombs.htm
> > >
> > Oh. My. God.
> >
> > I take it one like it got dropped at least once during WWII?
>
> "The first time the Grand Slam bomb was u
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003, Gene Buckle wrote:
> > And then you hang 22,000lbs of bomb under one and it gets...
> >
> > ...interesting.
> >
> > http://www.johnmullen.org.uk/aerospce/pics/bombs.htm
> >
> Oh. My. God.
>
> I take it one like it got dropped at least once during WWII?
"The first time the G
> And then you hang 22,000lbs of bomb under one and it gets...
>
> ...interesting.
>
> http://www.johnmullen.org.uk/aerospce/pics/bombs.htm
>
Oh. My. God.
I take it one like it got dropped at least once during WWII?
g.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 12:56:46 -0500, "Curtis L. Olson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>David Megginson writes:
>> When we were climbing out from Toronto/City Centre (CYTZ) on Sunday, a
>> WWII Lancaster bomber passed 500 feet above us. I just discovered
>> today that my ten-year-old daughter snapped t
David Megginson writes:
> When we were climbing out from Toronto/City Centre (CYTZ) on Sunday, a
> WWII Lancaster bomber passed 500 feet above us. I just discovered
> today that my ten-year-old daughter snapped two pictures of it passing
> over us, without telephoto (to give an idea of distances):
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 18:15, David Megginson wrote:
> When we were climbing out from Toronto/City Centre (CYTZ) on Sunday, a
> WWII Lancaster bomber passed 500 feet above us. I just discovered
> today that my ten-year-old daughter snapped two pictures of it passing
> over us, without telephoto
On Tuesday 19 August 2003 10:35, Matevz Jekovec wrote:
> Lee Elliott wrote:
>
> >On Monday 18 August 2003 09:41, Matevz Jekovec wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Lee Elliott wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hello All,
> >>>
> >>>while this isn't directly linked to the Glut/SDL issue, it occurred to me
> >>>
When we were climbing out from Toronto/City Centre (CYTZ) on Sunday, a
WWII Lancaster bomber passed 500 feet above us. I just discovered
today that my ten-year-old daughter snapped two pictures of it passing
over us, without telephoto (to give an idea of distances):
http://www.megginson.com/pri
[...] Then, FlightGear should strengthen this object
iluminosity or even scale it to match the strength of this light on
current view.
Yes, these fake lights should be scaled up with the view distance.
The fade out much too soon otherwise. But there's no "view distance"
p
Lee Elliott wrote:
On Monday 18 August 2003 09:41, Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Lee Elliott wrote:
Hello All,
while this isn't directly linked to the Glut/SDL issue, it occurred to me
that
if we ever consider moving to a different or i
Jonathan Polley wrote:
I have been remiss in my duties of keeping FlightGear up to date under
MacOS X (something to do with work). I finally had a chance to build
everything again and hit a problem with the 3D cloud code. After much
gnashing of teeth, I was able to get
simgear/scene/sky/cloud
* Matevz Jekovec -- Monday 18 August 2003 22:26:
> Is this at the top a rotating object (like a lighthouse) or a blinking
> light (like aircraft lights)?
It's just a strong, blinking light. Neither rotating nor really
flashing (despite the object name).
> [...] Then, FlightGear should strength
16 matches
Mail list logo
