Durk Talsma wrote:
On Wednesday 09 June 2004 23:30, Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
The MD-11 is still in progress. The current version on the CVS is just a
plain model, and is lacking UVW mapping coordinates (because I didn't add
them). This is why you are seeing all those "texture coordinate missi
Alex Perry wrote:
From: "Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It is instrument specific as to what it does when the computed distance goes
below zero. Some of them just report zero distance, while others go negative.
Often, the ones that clamp at zero will still be showing a non-zero speed.
From:
Jacek wrote:
Durk Talsma wrote:
In a strange kind of way it was kinda satisfying to see all these
reports about these console messages coming in last week, because it
indicates to me that the traffic manager is really running silently in
the background and hasn't yet led to any major compile-ti
Alex Romosan wrote:
this is probably a bug in the planning. third, i was flying the t38
but the md11 didn't show up on the radar (the two 737's did, as well
as some other plane unknown plane).
There are the two 737's from the demo scenario and there should be an
A-4 when taking off in the T-38.
T
Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alex Perry wrote:
> > From: "Curtis L. Olson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > It is instrument specific as to what it does when the computed distance
goes
> > below zero. Some of them just report zero distance, while others go
> negative.
> > Often, the ones th
The sender would like to recall the message, "[Flightgear-devel] fgfs CVS: failure".<>___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
I re-downloaded source and data this morning. The source code built without
error for Cygwin/XP.
On running the program stopped with the following:
Adding subsystem Traffic Manager
Unknown exception in the main loop. Aborting...
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
The stack dump includes the follo
Erik Hofman wrote:
> The radar display is currently limited to three (or four, I can't
> remember) aircraft hard coded in the configuration file. Changing that
> requires Nasal to be able to position a textured quad somewhere in
> screen space or additional C++ code to handle all situations.
Trust
I have run an additional test on DME bias.
The NACO approach plate for the KLAX ILS 6L says that the DME should read
1.6 nm over the threshold; the NACO approach plate for the KLAX ILS 24R says
that the DME should read 1.9 nm over the threshold.
For background, both the ILS 6L and the ILS 24R us
Andy Ross wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
> The radar display is currently limited to three (or four, I can't
> remember) aircraft hard coded in the configuration file. Changing that
> requires Nasal to be able to position a textured quad somewhere in
> screen space or additional C++ code to handle a
Andy Ross wrote:
Erik Hofman wrote:
> The radar display is currently limited to three (or four, I can't
> remember) aircraft hard coded in the configuration file. Changing that
> requires Nasal to be able to position a textured quad somewhere in
> screen space or additional C++ code to handle a
Josh Babcock wrote:
> What about putting a node in the model xml defining what type of radar
> return the object would produce (cross section size and transponder
> y/n) and then having whatever code positions the object in the scene
> graph also register the radar data in the property tree? That
This week I tweaked the autopilot of the MD11 a bit, and right now I have a
reasonably well working autothrottle and altitude hold. I also modified the
engine configuration file a bit by lowering the default TSFC and by-pass
ratio values, based on information I found on the web.
So, this morni
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:03:52 +0200
Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[JSBSim MD-11 Engine comments]
Durk:
Dave Culp can answer this more precisely if he's around, but for a
quick response let me tell you that we have recently made some changes
and fixes to the tank operation for JSBSim. The
Last week, Erik Hofman was kind enough to commit the first version of a
traffic manager into cvs. Since then, I've been hinting at the exsistence of
this system, but because I was a little low on time so I didn't have a chance
to tell more about it.
So, what is the traffic manager? Simply put,
On Thursday 10 June 2004 21:23, Jon S Berndt wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:03:52 +0200
> Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [JSBSim MD-11 Engine comments]
>
> Durk:
>
> Dave Culp can answer this more precisely if he's around, but for a
> quick response let me tell you that we have recen
On Thursday 10 June 2004 03:16, Alex Romosan wrote:
> Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm only a bit dissapointed that nobody's yet reported actually
> > _seeing_ one of MD11's take off. :-) :-)
>
> i just did :-) took off from SFO and followed it for a couple of hours
> to the canadian
Would it be possible to have FlightGear automatically download a schedule from
the Internet?
Regards,
Ampere
On June 10, 2004 04:27 pm, Durk Talsma wrote:
> I'd rather spend my time on
> writing some code to autogenerate these flightplans than manually typing in
> the position of all these waypo
> So, this morning, I tried doing some range testing, and found that the MD11
> prototype can now fly a distance of about 4500 miles. This may seem a bit
> short, but I discovered that the (aeromatic generated) JSBSim configuration
> file has four fuel tanks, but the engines draw fuel from only thr
Hi Durk
Durk Talsma writes
So, this morning, I tried doing some range testing, and found that the MD11
prototype can now fly a distance of about 4500 miles. This may seem a bit
short, but I discovered that the (aeromatic generated) JSBSim configuration
file has four fuel tanks, but the engines dra
Here's a screenshot of refueling (a 737 and T-38 ???)
http://home.comcast.net/~davidculp2/refuel.jpg
I've added a green light between the fuel guages that illuminates when you're
within the refueling envelope. Useful for testing the envelope.
Dave
--
David Culp
[E
21 matches
Mail list logo
